Search results

Is this the legal definition of Taiwan, or your proposed definition?

And if adultery laws were civil violations, sure. But they seem to be treated as criminal violations instead. And that's a big difference. But your point about meeting a contract is a good one.

The biggest problem is that government doesn't exist to legislate morality, and it shouldn't. Adultery is shitty, sure, but is none of the goernment's business, much like most of the times people are shitty people. Or why stop at adultery? Why not legislate forgetting you spouses birthday?