Search results

  1. Abhishekm

    Philosophy Might In The End Unfortunately Decides What Is “Right”

    That is the point. Objectively speaking without people, there are no morals because reality doesn't care. You could make a case for morals being evolutionary traits based on what is of greatest benefit but again that goes into it being the people those traits evolved or became entrenched in...
  2. Abhishekm

    Philosophy Might In The End Unfortunately Decides What Is “Right”

    Thats your believed value yes. But it doesn't mean all share it and to them morality is based on what they belive as intrinsically true. Even to those who consider it something intrinsically true that truth differs. Thats fine, because that's how people are. That also scales with groups and at...
  3. Abhishekm

    Philosophy Might In The End Unfortunately Decides What Is “Right”

    Well yeah I kinda though that was obvious. Sure most pursuits into the matter are to find an objective right but thats because most of the 'might' in this day and age consider that 'right' Have you seen civilians make something without the might to back it up? Does not last that long. Half...
Back
Top