Search results for query: *

Dude, you're spewing the usual 'conservative' (really, reactionary) BS. Stop putting your foot in your mouth. Eh, that isn't exactly the case anymore. At this point, you'll need major social engineering...

This sounds like the usual 'feminism is evil!' dreck that I keep hearing from 'conservatives', the sort that keep yelling 'women should stay barefoot in the home!' at the top of their lungs (be publically like some, or via the anonymity of the internet). I'm dead serious here. Also, your models...

Yeah, so far Economists have been ignoring the fact that the technological context that they're working in isn't really like anything we've seen before. We can make parallels, of course, because history and time love to rhyme, but the reality is people are ignoring the actual reality and...

The sad thing is Sowell's wrong at least in part. Especially since many people keep forgetting that this itty-bitty 'little' thing called the technological context has a major pull on determining things. A lot of traditional economists keep ignoring this little determinator of how things go...

@Bear Templar, yeah, this video is the future: That is if my feeling about reality using my future-history setting notes as a sort of blueprint for our future like it used Stand on Zanzibar (for the last, oh, 48 years at least) is unfounded.

That isn't the case anymore. You're still using a series of assumptions that -simply put- have been annihilated by the evolving technological context. Machine learning has literally changed the game to the point that there is no game, so to speak. The only limit is the time to get the metadata...

Yeah, people forget this little thing called the technological context actually exists. This little tidbit gets overlooked that people don't see what is actually happening. The technological context is what made slavery considered outright evil despite it being a thing for millennia and...

Not really. Remember we're only starting to use 3D printing in any actual capacity. I wouldn't be surprised that speed and durability make great strides by the end of the century at the latest. Not really. We're talking about a complete job market collapse here on a scale that makes the skilled...

Here's something that you'll have to understand: humans are too expensive to hire, hence why companies have been going full steam ahead on automation and damn the consequences in doing so. I would be very surprised that waiters would be a thing by the halfway point of this century.

Not really, given that we're nowhere near AGIs yet. Really good expert systems, yes, but not AGIs.

You would actually be surprised in that regard. Machines, simply put, are getting better than humans overall. So it is most likely you'll have -at most- a bunch of overseers being in the work market and the jobs are done by machines that make Bester the Learning Robot look like an old logic...

The thing is, a BIG/BLG (Basic Income Guarantee/Basic Life Guarantee) is going to be the only way forward. Machine learning is, simply put, breaking every single preconception on AI we've got. It's better that we get his prepped and ready now than later. I wouldn't be surprised that, at the end...