Search results

Or were taken by germans.And,all they produce now is shitty food. When we have polish norm,you get 1kg of ham from 1kg of meat. Now? part of ham is ...something else then meat.The same goes for everything.

Dunno,but before we joined,it tasted great,now ,what you could buy in average shop is lore or less shitty.

Why not kill Dzyngis Khan using kielbasa made according to EU norm? ;)

True about stronger ERE - but,since they would be fighting Persia,France and other western countries woud remain catholic. But popes would be weaker,and Hungary would be butterflied,becouse we would have there still some slavic states. But,maybe no string GreatMoravia? or much stronger...

I think so England do not have allies,only affairs. If WW1 start 10 years later,when Russian Empire would be much stronger,then London would support germans.And i do not blame them - their politics of always beating stronger country in Europe was logical. Back to topic - i had 3 candidates...

It was british politic from at least 1738 - form coalition against stronger country on continent.Count Bolonbroke,if i remember correctly.Probably not.

France wonted their land back,prussians wonted more land,as usual,Russia feared that A-H would create Ukraine and destroy them.And England wonted war which bleed all powers on continent. Only A-H knew,that war mean their demise - but they feared,that showing weakness mean the same.So,they prefer...

WW1 could not be prevented,becouse everybody wanted it.But - you should kill Trotsky,not Lenin.He win revolution and later cyvil war. And - we would have more cool battleships during Jutland battle!

2,3-agree. 1- basically everybody and his dog wonted war,so it still happen,but later,which mean MOAR SUPER DUPER DREDNAUGHTS. That is why i would want it,too.WW1 would still occur - but,with more cool battleships. And,when we could not avoid war,then,at least,we should try made it more cool!