Search results

  1. A

    No Nukes is... Good Nukes?

    Indeed.Either it was accident,or big farma did so to made money on vaccines,and politicians agreed,becouse they got more power.
  2. A

    No Nukes is... Good Nukes?

    I am glad to hear that.Any country made mostly from one race/at least its elites/ would use that.
  3. A

    No Nukes is... Good Nukes?

    I only knew,that soviets worked on something like that.What they achieved,is another matter,ask some good biologist about it.Which mean,not me. Maybe @Zachowon would knew? he is working for military intelligience,if i remember correctly.
  4. A

    No Nukes is... Good Nukes?

    I remember book "Biochazard" by some ex-spviet scientist who run to USA - he claimed,that soviets worked on mix of pestilance and Ebola - which would kill 90% of population,but after month,not few days. If it is true,then Moscov arleady have it,and China ,USA,other major powers - probably ,too...
  5. A

    No Nukes is... Good Nukes?

    Back to brutal wars on all continencts,except Australia. For countries with relatively good armies,of course - Putin would be far less daring if he could not cry"let us win,or we nuke you"
  6. A

    No Nukes is... Good Nukes?

    If country X want invade country Y,they would still do that. But - since you could not erase enemy country any longer,countries which lost their arsenals and do not have good army would act less daring.
Back
Top