Search results for query: *
- Users: ATP
- With AHC: Khrushchev keeps himself in power with better security/political tactics, not policy change thread
- Content: Threads, Posts
- Order by date
-
A
AHC: Khrushchev keeps himself in power with better security/political tactics, not policy change
Interesting.Alliance with Germany - germans would love it,americans - not so.They have army with H warheads there. And,since soviets want attack China,we would have WW3 with commies on both sides. And cyvil war in soviet union. P.S I do not knew,that Gomółka really cared about Poland.Well,not...- Word Count: 67
- ATP
- Post #7
- Forum: Post-1900 Timelines & Discussion
-
A
AHC: Khrushchev keeps himself in power with better security/political tactics, not policy change
If you want change,you need First secretary who either become new Sralin/then we have WW3,defeat and world without soviets and probably USA/ Or somebody like chineese commies after Mao,who would turn soviets into capitalism.Soviets ruling world by now,then. Kruszczow would never trythat,so his...- Word Count: 55
- ATP
- Post #5
- Forum: Post-1900 Timelines & Discussion
-
A
AHC: Khrushchev keeps himself in power with better security/political tactics, not policy change
Nothing change,soviets still fall thanks to economy,or start war and die.- Word Count: 13
- ATP
- Post #2
- Forum: Post-1900 Timelines & Discussion