Search results

which mean,that survived worst.Those who always obeyed genociders,and helped them if they could get something from it. Indeed.Died thse who fought or only be decent,survived bandits and NKWD agents.Well,some lucky one and specialists,too - but it was negative selection.

1. - 16th century England was not feudal,but police state.With secret police creating "papist plots" so they could have ptetext to murder more catholic and steal their property. 2 and 3 - becouse russians never have feudalism,but slavic state of Moscov/where everybody but tsar was slave/ turned...

1.Exactly.Especially,that they saw other orthodox states as vassals who must obey them at best,and provinces at worst.I see fall of panslawizm made all by russian hands. 2.political was important,but emotional even more.Many really belived in third Rome bullshit,and i even read that tsar Mikolaj...

Do not forget about red pants.French generals really belived that sending soldiers against HMG would work better,if they have red pants.One even said,that red pants are France.What they were,WH40 orks ?

All true,but they initially planned to create so called "Judeopolonia" - state made from former Polish lands before Partition of Poland/of course germans would keep what they stealed/,ruled by germans and co-ruled by jews. Jews really was very loyal to germans,but they were poor soldiers,and...

In theory,yes. In practice - Germans being germans would manage something that made all french get them again. Russians being russians would want their empire back,tsar ot not tsar. England being England would wait for first occasion to create great coalition against germany. And in OTL they...

Wery probable.But,there would be no russian revolution,or at least not commies ruling here,so we have 100million+ people surviving.And WW2 started by France,Russia and England against German Europe.With every minority under german boot supporting them.

French being french,they would charge in their red pants - and get massacred.