if they can go out on bail then slow trial gives them an advantage if they can wait until the next election cycle is over.They should all call for a speedy trial
How so?if they can go out on bail then slow trial gives them an advantage if they can wait until the next election cycle is over.
high chance of desantis or trump being elected and crushing these corrupt scumbags
ever since civil war, states are subordinate to federal govt.How so?
It's all state level stuff
Like what?ever since civil war, states are subordinate to federal govt.
plus tons of angles of attack for a president against a state.
1. presidential pardon for everyone involvedLike what?
Honestly asking?
1. The president can pardon any offense against the USA.He can't pardon states.
Only governors can.
Sheriffs have not been involved so far. Only state police, which are not sheriffs. (the difference is that sheriffs are elected. police are appointed by local mayor)Sheriff's can deny FBI.
To a degree. explicitly subordinate to federal law ever since lincoln won the civil war.States make thier own laws...
These guys did things like ignore a supreme court order to NOT destroy evidence from the suspect voting machines.And the last one is to enforce federal mandate, as well as the NG didn't put up a fight.
Those were also MPs...
5. just stealing all the gold from citizens
The Emergency Banking Relief Act of 1933 and Executive Order 6102 authorized U.S. President Franklin Delano Roosevelt to force American citizens to relinquish their gold under penalty of the law.
Executive Order 6102 was implemented so the U.S. government could devalue the dollar more aggressively to stimulate the economy during the Great Depression. So long as citizens had the opportunity to preserve their wealth in gold, such economic stimulus would result in obvious, high inflation.
The executive order compensated owners $20.67 for each troy ounce of gold.
Executive Order 6102 was not a unique event in history. Mass gold confiscations have occurred around the world for thousands of years. Gold was confiscated en masse in Communist China, the United Kingdom, and the Soviet Union.In fact, soon after Executive Order. 6102, President Roosevelt raised the price of gold from $20.67 to $35 per ounce, devaluing the dollar by 58% in one day.
Gold is susceptible to mass confiscations because it is physically difficult to hide, secure, or transport. These inconveniences incentivize gold owners to store their gold with centralized custodians, usually banks. These banks are susceptible to government coercion. Whereas it would be extraordinarily costly to confiscate gold from millions of private homes, looting the far more limited number of banks is relatively efficient.
If they can arrest and persecute trump for saying that they cheated. which they claim is "undermining the integrity of elections"They also violate the integrity of elections via both their election cheating and kangaroo court of those who pointed out they cheated.
It isn't war. It is a 60 to 90 day operations that after words invovled funding from congress.1. The president can pardon any offense against the USA.
In theory that means that if something is legal at the federal level but illegal in the state level, then it is an offense against the state not an offense against the USA.
The state is trying to persecute for offenses that are also illegal at the USA level, which makes it offenses against the USA. So it can be pardoned
2. Federal agencies can also just seize a case and elevate it from state to federal level. At which point it would be the federal persecutor appointed by the president who is responsible for persecuting the case... or dropping it.
3. The inability to pardon offenses against states is hypothetical and has never been challenged in court, yet.
Sheriffs have not been involved so far. Only state police, which are not sheriffs. (the difference is that sheriffs are elected. police are appointed by local mayor)
To a degree. explicitly subordinate to federal law ever since lincoln won the civil war.
Also, these guys are breaking their own state laws.
These guys did things like ignore a supreme court order to NOT destroy evidence from the suspect voting machines.
They also violated various rights of those they persecute.
They also violate the integrity of elections via both their election cheating and kangaroo court of those who pointed out they cheated.
Lots of different mandates to enforce.
Also. presidents can absolutely act without mandate.
Examples include:
1. obama nationalizing auto industry, obama nationalizing student loans.
2. any antigun action by presidents
3. trail of tears forced relocation of amerindians
4. going to war without declaring one
5. just stealing all the gold from citizens
except:You literally sound like a leftist with this whole
WE MUST CONTROL EVERYTHIJG AND PUNISH THEM!
Not realizing this is exactly what they would use against us...and already have...
I am making predictions about things that could happen.Note that I am not advocating all these to be taken or are good ideas. just pointing out that president has lots of options.
Wow, you are wrong about just everything, aren't you?1. The president can pardon any offense against the USA.
In theory that means that if something is legal at the federal level but illegal in the state level, then it is an offense against the state not an offense against the USA.
The state is trying to persecute for offenses that are also illegal at the USA level, which makes it offenses against the USA. So it can be pardoned
Dual sovereignty doctrine also can prevent this. Now usually it isn't done this way, but a state can decide to go through with a prosecution even if Feds don't want them too. That applies especially in New York.2. Federal agencies can also just seize a case and elevate it from state to federal level. At which point it would be the federal persecutor appointed by the president who is responsible for persecuting the case... or dropping it.
It's inherent to the document. We have a limited government, and the government doesn't have unenumerated powers. Since the power isn't listed in the sentence giving pardon powers, it's not going to be there. And the conservatives aren't going to stretch the constitution to get there.3. The inability to pardon offenses against states is hypothetical and has never been challenged in court, yet.
Note the complete lack of mention about offenses against states. So no dice there.The President ... shall have Power to grant Reprieves and Pardons for Offenses against the United States, except in Cases of impeachment.
These arnt actual options.
These are authoritarian nightmares presented as ideas.
So no, these are not actual viable options