Ron Desantis, Kim Reynolds, Mitch McConnell, Greg Abbot, Dan Crenshaw, Nancy Mace, Burgess Owens, Glenn Youngkin, Marco Rubio, Peter Mejier, Tom Cotton, Brian Kemp, Thom Tillis, and Susan Collins to name a few (Not because of Susan Collins’s actual politics as much as her being the greatest lib owner alive.
Let’s GOOOOO!
You assume the courts will even start viewing such cases. They threw out the election cases, they will obey their demorat-masters by covering for anyone who gets caught.the punishment for obstruction of justice goes from a fine up to 10 years just want to remind people of that.
If there’s one good thing to come out of Trump not getting re-elected, it’s that the RINO’s/Uniparty have revealed their hand and opened at LOT of people’s eyes.Trumps biggest mistake was trusting the Republican leadership about who to nominate to various positions.
They were stabbing him in the back from the very beginning.
So, a tweet from a newsmax reporter claiming that someone else told her something, and later a picture of an open door. And all this from the company who stated for the record that they've already lied about voter fraud, admitted they have no evidence of fraud, and apologised to and paid the people they defamed by claiming fraud.
So, weak ass unverified hearsay on Twitter, from a source known to lie about the subject, followed by some spectacular textbook examples of confirmation bias.
I reiterate my previous request that we make it against the rules to Genetic fallacy things and attack a source instead of the argument.By that logic, we can never listen to any news organization about any topic ever, because they've all lied egregiously about something in the recent past and been caught doing so.
That's not to say that tweet is automatically trustworthy, but you need better evidence than "its from Newsmax, QED it is lies".
Well, first I didn't say it is a lie. I think it probably is, but I don't have proof so I wouldn't claim it. Rather my point was that the people accepting it as gospel truth were showing poor critical thinking. Second, there's a big difference between "Never trust anyone about anything if they've ever lied about something." and "I have doubts about this specific thing, which fits the demonstrated bias this group has lied to support very recently."By that logic, we can never listen to any news organization about any topic ever, because they've all lied egregiously about something in the recent past and been caught doing so.
That's not to say that tweet is automatically trustworthy, but you need better evidence than "its from Newsmax, QED it is lies".
Genetic fallacy is about ignoring context, it's not meant for the idea that the source is never relevant when judging information because of course it's relevant and suggesting otherwise would be silly. In this case, it doesn't apply. Their past demonstration of bias and willingness to lie to support that bias on the subject of fraud is probative when considering the veracity of some new information they'reclaiming, related to that same issue of fraud, that also supports their bias and which doesn't have any evidence to support it.I reiterate my previous request that we make it against the rules to Genetic fallacy things and attack a source instead of the argument.