The British would basically have to throw the Indians under bus. There was no realistic scenario where the settlers don't go west. Eventually the Brits will have to do either the Commonwealth thing or put off an imperial federation.
Get them to stop killing each other? The natives started fights and the settlers started fights. It's unfortunate but i doubt it could've been overly peaceful. Due to human nature and tribalistic instincts.
Hollywood's full of shitt. The Natives we're people people war on each other. As to the rest that was actually how it was supposed to be for the five civilised tribes. Andrew Jackson illegally removed them from Tennessee to Oklahoma. In what's called "The Trail of Tears". Without that maybe some of them could be intergrared. The ones who fought we're basically doomed though.
That's why I rate Andrew Jackson goes down as the worst president we've ever had. He was a genocidal maniac who expelled millions of people from their homes.
I'd imagine they would've interbreed with white folks enough. That they'd be the equivalent of "Irish" or "German" Americans. Because even with all the craziness slews of white men had babies with natives. That could only increase with close living situations. Also fun fact certain tribes kept slaves. Hollywood won't tell you that either.
I'm prettysure we actually did do that some. Our natives were quite a bit stronger than the aborgines though I think. I mean you don't hear about stuff like the Sioux(bad mother's) Apache (bad mother's) commache(bad mother's) or Seminole (baddest mother's). About the aborgines I could be wrong though. We've got some Aussies on here though they might know more.
Hey Mr Aussie. Did you guy's natives ever have strong rebellious tribes. Ala the Apache over here?The French forces (let alone the British) would have had a very tough time attacking across the Franco-German frontier in 1939, the Germans had defences on their side of the border too and realistically speaking the Polish didn't need all of the luftwaffe to defeat them. The Anglo-French forces would have been at serious risk of taking heavy losses even with a great pre-ponderance in forces just in time for the victorious German forces in Poland to return to the western front and smash into them, which leads us to...
The Molotov Ribbentrop pact wasn't just about Germany not having to face Russian forces in taking over Poland it was about being able to then divert most of those same forces to the west to fight the French and British afterwards instead of having to park on the new German-Soviet frontier. Before the pact the Western Allies probably thought that they had time, the pact was announced and concluded ONE WEEK before the invasion of Poland.
Now there is another way to get around the matter of German border defences and guard divisions along the Franco-German border... violate Belgian and possibly even Dutch neutrality and attack Germany that way. Which would mean declaring war on Belgium and the Netherlands which would likely result in them joining Germany
So as I see it the phony war can be laid at the feet of Belgium's ridiculous wishful thinking desire for neutrality and the intelligence agencies of Britain and France who hadn't seen the Molotov Ribbentrop pact coming.
To an extent with China they called the Romans Da Quin(western China). The distance prevented more than basic trade though.
Minor contact between the two powers was very limited with each other due to distance and foreign powers that were in the way. It's also quite possible the Roman prisoners taken during the battle of Carrhae ended up in China.
There's a Jackie Chan movie about them actually. Give me a bit and I'll see if I can find the name.
