Star Trek The Birth of a Federation Military

Aldarion

Neoreactionary Monarchist
My personal choice would be the Akira class. According to Alex Jaeger (the designer of that and many other ships) he designed it to have 15 torpedo tubes and a flight deck running through the middle so it could serve as an aircraft carrier type. It was his gunship/carrier/battlecruier of the Federation.

iG6M5x0.png

Problem is that Akira class doesn't have a flight-through deck, instead it has around 15 torpedo tubes and what looks to be a normal shuttlebay (but could be much larger on the inside):

Besides, if you wanted a carrier, something like Galaxy-class would be a much better fit.
 

Bear Ribs

Well-known member
Yes, I know, they used them that one time. But you misunderstand my point. I didn't starfleet has no fighters, I said they don't use them in the role that was proposed upthread, as a colonial defense militia ship. We've seen dozens and dozens of federation colonies in the show, several of which involved the colony being attacked by enemies, and not once did they scramble fighters to defend themselves. The only defensive systems we've seen are shielded ground installations, satellite weapons, and I think sometimes some surface to space batteries.
Actually we do see fighters being scrambled from several times in defense of planets and stations.

Best of Both Worlds: After all the starships are taken out by the Borg cube at Wolf 359, we see a squadron of fighters make a suicide run on the cube once it enters the Sol System. Granted they get insta-gibbed but that's against a Borg Cube. This is one of the things that suggested to me that Federation fighter pilots are crazy-loyalists who are the last line between enemies and worlds.

Conundrum: When the Enterprise attacks Lysian Central Command under amnesia, a swarm of fighters (Lysian Sentry Pods) are scrambled to protect it.

Dragon's Teeth: It was an attack rather than a defense, but once the Vaadwaur lure Voyager into close range they scramble fighters from their city and assault Voyager with them.

Dreadnought: When the Dreadnought gets close to their home planet, the Rakosans scramble squadrons of Rakosan fighters to intercept it.

Probably quite a few more I can't remember given how many years of show there are.

Yes, that was my point. Small, one or two man fighters are clearly viable combats in the setting, there's not a need to build them bigger so that they can have more crew spaces.
But we don't know of any viable one or two man fighters in the setting. We know the peregrine courier is meant to hold one or two people but it's not a fighter but a civilian courier. The only vessel we can confirm is a combat craft with a two-person crew are the scorpions in Nemesis. As for the scorpions, given that the Remans never deploy them in the raging battle they have even when the Scimitar was disabled, I strongly suspect they were never intended for anti-ship work. They're also actually the size of large cars rather than the sizeable vessels we see being used as fighters everywhere else. When we see the thing in action, it's firepower is about on par with with a phaser/disruptor rifle rather than ship-scale weapons, nothing like actual fighters in the show.



If anything, this shows that tiny one-two man fighters are not viable in trek. We know two-man craft are on the Scimitar and it's in an extended battle and eventually disabled, and yet they never bother to send them against the Enterprise. I suspect the scorpion was designed more as some sort of infantry support vehicle, or possibly a terror weapon meant to attack humanoids on the ground given that it's disruptors can't take out anything heavier than a door.

That's a plausible argument, but it has a peregrine class fighter sized hole in it. And also in some material, an even more massive, space carrier sized hole.
There is no such thing as the peregrine class fighter. There's a peregrine class courier that nobody can identify though... Personally, I suspect the peregrine is the tiny 10m Bajoran craft, anything larger clearly holds a pretty decent crew given Chakotay's Maquis Raider had a crew of about 40 and was only 50 meters long. Kira was able to identify the peregrine instantly, while Sisko wasn't familiar with it, after all, which suggests to me that the peregrine isn't Federation but Bajoran. That's pretty much all conjecture on my part though.

One other thing we can look at is how Star Trek itself views it. Memory Alpha has a listing specifically for canon Fighter craft and the Jem'Hadar fighter is on the list alongside the Federation fighter and many others.

My point is ultimately that while size does matter, it does not matter enough so that small ships are automatically SOL when going up against a larger ship. There is a degree of overlap in capability. In any real case scenario, a ship that amasses 355,000 metric tons should not come anywhere close to the performance of a ship that amasses at around 5,000,000 metric tons. Granted, a lot of the Enterprise D's space is used for non-military purposes, but the Enterprise is about 14x more massive than the Defiant, but it's only getting a 4 second edge on engine performance? Granted, that adds up over 12 hours--specifically a day, which is what they gained in "The Sound of her Voice", but it's just not what you would expect.
I theorize that there's a tonnage area where you get the most "bang for buck" on a ship for combat purposes (with that varying a bit depending on your tech base). This is actually on the smaller side and you get diminishing returns as your ship gets bigger, and the Defiant is right in that sweet spot., hence why it's not the size of a Galaxy. Coincidentally several of the other most effective (per ton) combat craft, the B'Rel, Jem'Hadar fighter, etc. also have a similar general size.
 

Sixgun McGurk

Well-known member
What we're looking for is an attack ship, like the old F14 Tomcat that can carry a missile capable of destroying anything it hits into range of a large combatant while evading fire. Assuming that the large combatant never misses anything it sees and that no small hull can shield against serious weapons fire then to have fighters there must be stealth involved.
 

S'task

Renegade Philosopher
Administrator
Staff Member
Founder
I may admit that perhaps we're not on the same page, but when I say the speed difference is not all that great, this is what I mean;

  • Warp 9 -- 1,516c
  • Warp 9.2 -- 1,649c
  • Warp 9.6 -- 1,909c
  • Warp 9.9 -- 3,053c
  • Warp 9.99 -- 7,912c
The Enterprise D, despite being far, far more massive than the Defiant, tops out at around 9.6 to the Defiant's Warp 9.5. It is faster, much faster--but it's not exactly the leaps and bounds you might expect, despite the two ships being more or less within the same generation. Voyager and Intrepid class ships are really fucking fast, being well over 3,000c. The Defiant is not really what I'd call slow. In fact, from a strategic sense, they're more or less the same.
You're comparing apples and oranges. Yes, the Defiant class is only slightly slower than the Galaxy class, but that shouldn't come as a surprise, the Galaxy class is at least 20 years older as far as design goes and, to be frank, has terrible warp geometry based on pretty much every other Starfleet cruiser design ever (the Galaxy is also arguably a failed design per Starfleet standards, seeing use for only about a 20 year window compared to the Excelsior and Miranda class' nearly 100 year service history). Further the Defiant is said to have a power plant of comparable size TO a Galaxy class ship (hense its overpowered phaser cannons), but with a smaller frame and its terrible warp geometry it is SLOWER at warp than a Galaxy. Meanwhile the Sovereign class, which came out only a few years after the Defiant, is pulling a warp speed of 9.985 to 9.995 depending on the sources while all the ships of a similar size to Defiant are, in fact, faster, as I already laid out.

As another noted, the Defiant fills the role of a "shore monitor" quite well, and works quite well in fleet engagements, but is slower and has shorter range when compared to other designs.
 

Doomsought

Well-known member
Given its intended role, the galaxy was probably designed to get the most fuel efficiency at cruising speed rather than pushing its maximum warp speed. An experiment in design doctrine that quickly fell out of favor because maximum speed is improves emergency response capabilities and capital-ships are self refueling anyways.
 

Spartan303

In Captain America we Trust!
Administrator
Staff Member
Founder
Osaul
Given its intended role, the galaxy was probably designed to get the most fuel efficiency at cruising speed rather than pushing its maximum warp speed. An experiment in design doctrine that quickly fell out of favor because maximum speed is improves emergency response capabilities and capital-ships are self refueling anyways.


Its a flying luxury yacht and small town with weapons tacted on after the fact. The Galaxy class is a symbol of the pacifist Federation hubris if anything. It wasn't until they started getting their teeth kicked in that the Federation started to change. The Sovereign however is a very different beast and is what the Galaxy class should have been.
 

S'task

Renegade Philosopher
Administrator
Staff Member
Founder
Its a flying luxury yacht and small town with weapons tacted on after the fact. The Galaxy class is a symbol of the pacifist Federation hubris if anything. It wasn't until they started getting their teeth kicked in that the Federation started to change. The Sovereign however is a very different beast and is what the Galaxy class should have been.
I hate the Galaxy class as much as the next guy and have written long takedowns of its design and capabilities, but you do have to consider the period in which it was designed before entirely calling it Federation hubris. The period in which the Galaxy was designed was one of the most peaceful periods in Federation history where the Federation hegemony of the Alpha and Beta quadrants were at their absolute height. The Klingon Empire had been turned from an existential threat into a peaceful neighbor and even ally. The Romulans had returned to absolute isolation and were showing no interest in dealing with the Federation. The Cardassians were at most an annoyance who nipped at the Federation's heel and could be bought off with little cost to the Federation as a whole. There were no hostile peer powers LEFT to deal with, in fact, the Federation was in a situation like the US found itself in the 1990s...

And seeing how the US handled the peace and hegemony of the 1990s, can you really call what the Federation did "hubris", I'd argue they handled their "end of history" moment much better than the US did, what with our literally funding the infrastructure to raise up a new peer rival that has systematically corrupted our institutions and media. Say what you will with the Federation negotiating away some border colonies to the Cardassians and designing a heavily flawed cruiser, they didn't give away their technology, economy, and media to a hostile foreign power which their elites then tried to cover for all while claiming it was a good thing. In point of fact, when the Federation was hit with their wakeup moments of Wolf 359 and the loss of the USS Odyssey, they manned up... meanwhile the US elites have... yeah...
 

Bear Ribs

Well-known member
The Galaxy was quite good for what it was, I think. It was a bit too multi-role, being able to serve as a science vessel, warship, transport, diplomatic envoy, etc. When it went up against dedicated warships in it's own weight class like the D'Deridex, it held it's own which is pretty impressive for a ship that treated "combat" as it's third, maybe fourth priority in design.
 

Spartan303

In Captain America we Trust!
Administrator
Staff Member
Founder
Osaul
I hate the Galaxy class as much as the next guy and have written long takedowns of its design and capabilities, but you do have to consider the period in which it was designed before entirely calling it Federation hubris. The period in which the Galaxy was designed was one of the most peaceful periods in Federation history where the Federation hegemony of the Alpha and Beta quadrants were at their absolute height. The Klingon Empire had been turned from an existential threat into a peaceful neighbor and even ally. The Romulans had returned to absolute isolation and were showing no interest in dealing with the Federation. The Cardassians were at most an annoyance who nipped at the Federation's heel and could be bought off with little cost to the Federation as a whole. There were no hostile peer powers LEFT to deal with, in fact, the Federation was in a situation like the US found itself in the 1990s...

And seeing how the US handled the peace and hegemony of the 1990s, can you really call what the Federation did "hubris", I'd argue they handled their "end of history" moment much better than the US did, what with our literally funding the infrastructure to raise up a new peer rival that has systematically corrupted our institutions and media. Say what you will with the Federation negotiating away some border colonies to the Cardassians and designing a heavily flawed cruiser, they didn't give away their technology, economy, and media to a hostile foreign power which their elites then tried to cover for all while claiming it was a good thing. In point of fact, when the Federation was hit with their wakeup moments of Wolf 359 and the loss of the USS Odyssey, they manned up... meanwhile the US elites have... yeah...


You might have an argument if we were arguing the US vs the Federation in terms of Hubris. But we are talking about ships, not State foreign policy.

So a more accurate discussion would be between Starfleet and the US Navy. Thankfully the Navy was never stupid enough to build something akin to the Galaxy class. But they do have their own fail if the LCS ships are as problematic as I've heard.
 

Battlegrinder

Someday we will win, no matter what it takes.
Moderator
Staff Member
Founder
Obozny
You have this bad habit of intentionally assuming that obvious things are not obviously done for no obvious reason. I think you should try and present an argument as to WHY the Federation would not do something that is to their advantage.

Because the federation has an established habit of not doing advantageous things. They don't issue helmets, night vision equipment, grenades, or personal shields to their soldiers. Their soldiers are limited to semi-automatic rifles, with no dedicated sniper weapons, SAWs, or other weapons for effective infantry tactics. Their ships lack anti-missile point defense weapons. And they have the technology to do all of these things.

I'm sorry, but the sheer volume difference between the Defiant and any ship--even an 80 year old ship, should be a complete curbstomp in the larger ship's favor. ST technology just seems to work a bit differently. That can be explained by the amount of energy a small ship can have access to and effectively use for any given task. Warp reactors generate a lot of energy, but weapons generate comparatively little.

It was a complete curbstomp in the larger ship's favor in the second engagement, and given ST treknology, and the Lakota had the edge at the end of the fight as well, despite it's age.

Actually we do see fighters being scrambled from several times in defense of planets and stations.

When used by more non federation powers, yes (and that's still only 3 incidents out of dozens and dozens). Much less advanced non federation powers, at that. Only the Best of Both Worlds case had the federation try it, and it was clearly a desperate, doomed effort. It makes sense they would try it anyway, it's better to try and almost certainly die than just die, but that doesn't suggest they would do this sort of thing all the time.

But we don't know of any viable one or two man fighters in the setting.

db4e42ea-8122-4c56-a5eb-95a5c9f0caca.jpg


There is no such thing as the peregrine class fighter.

Peregrine Attack Fighter
 

Bear Ribs

Well-known member
When used by more non federation powers, yes (and that's still only 3 incidents out of dozens and dozens). Much less advanced non federation powers, at that. Only the Best of Both Worlds case had the federation try it, and it was clearly a desperate, doomed effort. It makes sense they would try it anyway, it's better to try and almost certainly die than just die, but that doesn't suggest they would do this sort of thing all the time.
Show us some of these dozens then. Where can you point to an episode where there's an attack on a space-faring planet and:

1: There are no Starships available to provide.
2: The planet provably does not scramble any fighters.

If there's dozens and dozens you shouldn't have a problem finding some.

You can prove anything in Trek once you start pulling in non-canon sources like magazines. Shall we also accept that Romulan ships can teleport? Another magazine has the X-Men meeting with the Enterprise crew, are they part of Trek canon now? Did Kirk actually come back from the dead after Generations, join the Romulans, then destroy the Borg?
 

S'task

Renegade Philosopher
Administrator
Staff Member
Founder
It was a complete curbstomp in the larger ship's favor in the second engagement, and given ST treknology, and the Lakota had the edge at the end of the fight as well, despite it's age.
I'd always hesitate to call the Lakota vs Defiant fight very definitive for anything, both ships were holding back a LOT in the engagement and seeking to disable, rather than destroy, the other ship. You'll note neither ship ever used Photon Torpedoes in the fight as I recall, limiting themselves to the much more precise Phasers of each ship. When they finally got to the point where it was kill or be killed, the Lakota backed down rather than seek to destroy the Defiant.

Had both ships been going at it full bore we cannot really say who would have won.

And here's the thing with Trek, power output of ships is way more important than size. Phaser power in Trek is actually directly related to warp power, as Phaser power is derived from the warp engine (see Star Trek: TMP). Further due to ships using both energy shields and structural integrity fields, core ship power directly ties to the durability of ships again rather than mass or design. At the end of the day the core concern for Trek ships is how much power can their cores produce to power the subsystems, and that does, to a degree, favor larger ship designs (to a point). It also is why fighters in Trek are weaksause, they simply do not have the volume for large power plants that allow them optimal shield, SFI, and weapons power when compared to larger vessels.

Of course, there's also tradeoffs. Larger ships and cores require more anti-matter fuel, and thus more anti-matter fuel storage, which is a major design vulnerability. The quick destruction of the Odyssey, for instance, is precisely tied to this issue, as the location where the ship was rammed was right in the main anti-matter storage area of the ship (and the VFx reflect this, if you pay attention there's actually TWO explosions when the Odyssey is destroyed, an initial one from the ramming and then a secondary one from the anti-matter reserves cooking off).

Oh, this is another reason why the Defiant is most obviously a defensive ship that needs berthing: it has a massive warp core while having much more limited anti-matter storage.
 

S'task

Renegade Philosopher
Administrator
Staff Member
Founder
You can prove anything in Trek once you start pulling in non-canon sources like magazines. Shall we also accept that Romulan ships can teleport? Another magazine has the X-Men meeting with the Enterprise crew, are they part of Trek canon now? Did Kirk actually come back from the dead after Generations, join the Romulans, then destroy the Borg?
That's conflating two VERY different types of secondary sources. The Eaglemoss booklets are typically written with background information taken from the show's development journals and the like, not just made-up stuff for fictional stories. In fact, most of the non-screen information in the Eaglemoss boolets appears on Memory Alpha down in the behind the scenes and background notes sections, rather than on Memory Beta.
 

Bear Ribs

Well-known member
That's conflating two VERY different types of secondary sources. The Eaglemoss booklets are typically written with background information taken from the show's development journals and the like, not just made-up stuff for fictional stories. In fact, most of the non-screen information in the Eaglemoss boolets appears on Memory Alpha down in the behind the scenes and background notes sections, rather than on Memory Beta.

It would not appear to be so from looking at the Memory Alpha page, which links to Ex Astris Scientia but not Eaglemoss, and in fact directly contradicts the information on Battlegrinder's image. I'll retract my statement if anybody can show that Eaglemoss is actually canon.
 

Sailor.X

Cold War Veteran
Founder
Its a flying luxury yacht and small town with weapons tacted on after the fact. The Galaxy class is a symbol of the pacifist Federation hubris if anything. It wasn't until they started getting their teeth kicked in that the Federation started to change. The Sovereign however is a very different beast and is what the Galaxy class should have been.
Would it have really hurt them to put actually Hull Armor on the Galaxy's instead of relying on shields. I mean you would die of Alcohol poisoning if you take a shot every time the Enterprise Ds shields dropped during combat scenes. They forgot the one rule of Empires (And yes the UFP is an Empire as much as they hate to admit it) Your Flagship needs to be a beast of a ship that can not only deal damage but take damage as well. Thankfully they sidelined that Brahams lady and her team and got in some real Warship Engineers to create the War Galaxies and the Galaxy Xs. But it took the Dominon anal raping the Odyssey to cause that change.
 

Battlegrinder

Someday we will win, no matter what it takes.
Moderator
Staff Member
Founder
Obozny
Show us some of these dozens then. Where can you point to an episode where there's an attack on a space-faring planet and:

1: There are no Starships available to provide.
2: The planet provably does not scramble any fighters.

If there's dozens and dozens you shouldn't have a problem finding some.

Survivors comes to mind. A Colony of 11,000 people, that was explicitly stated to have zero interstellar spacecraft.

You can prove anything in Trek once you start pulling in non-canon sources like magazines. Shall we also accept that Romulan ships can teleport? Another magazine has the X-Men meeting with the Enterprise crew, are they part of Trek canon now? Did Kirk actually come back from the dead after Generations, join the Romulans, then destroy the Borg?

Eaglemoss's ships are all from the series, and all the information in the little packets that come with the ship is from the show or the backstage production elements of the show, they're not inventing their own canon.

As for other material, that's on a case by case. I'm not welded to my old "show and movies only, nothing else" position, and if you still are, just ask @The Original Sixth about how clear ST the lines of what is and isn't canon in star trek are, I think what's more important is fitting into the overall setting and respecting what star trek is. So I'm generally willing to accept material from STO, it's a lot more in line with the the rest of the series that STD and Picard. Particularly for something so simple as "confirming that the peregrine class fighter is in fact the thing that most people think it is".
 

Bear Ribs

Well-known member
Survivors comes to mind. A Colony of 11,000 people, that was explicitly stated to have zero interstellar spacecraft.
And does that also mean no light craft? Bajor also had no interstellar spacecraft but they have Bajoran fighters. The script suggests something was available because:

1: The Husnock bombarded the planet from Orbit, destroying all structures and even all surface water.
2: According to the script, "So you let the colonists fight a hopeless battle." "And then what you most feared, happened. Rishon went to fight with the colonists, and died with them."

What method do you think Rishon and the colonists used go and fight an enemy ship in orbit?
 

Aldarion

Neoreactionary Monarchist
Because the federation has an established habit of not doing advantageous things. They don't issue helmets, night vision equipment, grenades, or personal shields to their soldiers. Their soldiers are limited to semi-automatic rifles, with no dedicated sniper weapons, SAWs, or other weapons for effective infantry tactics. Their ships lack anti-missile point defense weapons. And they have the technology to do all of these things.

Anti-missile point defense weapons are, in prime Star Trek, never used by anyone. In fact, they are quite useless: starships already can shoot down swarms of missiles with their primary phasers, yet never do so against torpedoes. Meanwhile we know that torpedoes are shielded with shields powerful enough to withstand pressure inside a star.

So they don't have PDS because it is a waste of time, space and energy.

And does that also mean no light craft? Bajor also had no interstellar spacecraft but they have Bajoran fighters. The script suggests something was available because:

1: The Husnock bombarded the planet from Orbit, destroying all structures and even all surface water.
2: According to the script, "So you let the colonists fight a hopeless battle." "And then what you most feared, happened. Rishon went to fight with the colonists, and died with them."

What method do you think Rishon and the colonists used go and fight an enemy ship in orbit?

Ground emplacements?
 

Battlegrinder

Someday we will win, no matter what it takes.
Moderator
Staff Member
Founder
Obozny
Anti-missile point defense weapons are, in prime Star Trek, never used by anyone. In fact, they are quite useless: starships already can shoot down swarms of missiles with their primary phasers, yet never do so against torpedoes. Meanwhile we know that torpedoes are shielded with shields powerful enough to withstand pressure inside a star.

Torpedoes are missiles, and they can be shot down, Voyager did it. Nor does the ability for torpedoes modified for a particularly mission to withstand being fired into a sun (for a moment anyway) mean that therefor all torpedoes are capable of withstanding fire from other weapons, or even just a counter-missile being fired at them. If they were, why not just use torpedos to intercept incoming weapon fire, letting hostile phaser beams bounce off it's invulnerable shielding?

So they don't have PDS because it is a waste of time, space and energy.

Replacing a starship that's been blown to atoms by a torpedo salvo is a much greater waste of time, space, and energy, not to mention lives.

Alright I concede the point, that's quite plausible.

So since my four examples were not enough evidence for Battlegrinder, and he only has one so far, let's see what shows up next.

A second possibility would be that while the Husnock bombarded the colony at first, they later followed up with a ground assault to finish off survivors.

Also, you didn't have 4 examples. You had one, and it was an attack on the heart of the federation itself, which was able to scramble all of five ships to defend itself. That's not a good basis for a claim that every colony (or every larger colony) should have like a dozen or so fighters on hand to defend itself.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top