What if Oppenheimer's consciousness from July 21, 1945 was transferred back to July 21st, 1943? How many months can this shave off getting to a bomb?

raharris1973

Well-known member
What if Oppenheimer's consciousness from July 21, 1945 was transferred back to July 21st, 1943? How many months can this shave off getting to a bomb?

July 21st 1945 was five days after the successful Trinity test in New Mexico.

July 21st 1943 was the day after Leslie Groves gave Oppenheimer gave him his clearance to be in charge of so many elements of the project.

The usual caveats of the mental self-insert apply. He doesn't freak out, act up or speak out in ways that make him appear insane and get dragged off. He doesn't actually go insane. He knows how to keep his mouth shut but how to interject to avoid blind alleys, wasted time and mistakes.

How soon can deliverable bombs be made with one senior physicist and program manager's personal knowledge of the big picture, but all the material needing to be worked?
 
What if Oppenheimer's consciousness from July 21, 1945 was transferred back to July 21st, 1943? How many months can this shave off getting to a bomb?

July 21st 1945 was five days after the successful Trinity test in New Mexico.

July 21st 1943 was the day after Leslie Groves gave Oppenheimer gave him his clearance to be in charge of so many elements of the project.

The usual caveats of the mental self-insert apply. He doesn't freak out, act up or speak out in ways that make him appear insane and get dragged off. He doesn't actually go insane. He knows how to keep his mouth shut but how to interject to avoid blind alleys, wasted time and mistakes.

How soon can deliverable bombs be made with one senior physicist and program manager's personal knowledge of the big picture, but all the material needing to be worked?
Do not matter.
FDR and Truman would still gave half of Europe to Sralin instead of bombing soviets to stone age,like they should.
 
Do not matter.
FDR and Truman would still gave half of Europe to Sralin instead of bombing soviets to stone age,like they should.
That's kind of a weakly reductionist political answer to a technological question, that should still have technological consequences, and consequences on military and diplomatic timing.
 
That's kind of a weakly reductionist political answer to a technological question, that should still have technological consequences, and consequences on military and diplomatic timing.
Becouse you could be technological advanced,like USA in 1945,and still do dump things becouse of politics.
Like not killing soviets when they have both chance and good pretext for that.

USA could be only superpower now with monopoly on nuclear weapons,but they lost that chance - becouse their politicians were idiots.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top