Look at the thread title, and this movie wasn't made in Hollywood either.I'm not talking about the movie here, I'm refering to Hollywood.
Look at the thread title, and this movie wasn't made in Hollywood either.I'm not talking about the movie here, I'm refering to Hollywood.
Learning this just made me wonder how much this fact is linked to that 10-year old drag queen people keep parading around... he's also called a 'performer'....So yes, it appears in California child porn in not child porn if the kid in question is a "performer"...
What the actual hell? Looking this up, it appears to have been a matter of State law, not Federal, and the State in question appears to have been, to nobody's surprise, California.
I mean, in fairness to Hollywood, there is a difference between child nudity and child porn. There's actually a lot of movie situations in which I can see child nudity being considered part of the legitimate move making art (IE, a family scene where parents are giving kids a bath. A newborn baby scene just after a mother giving birth. A rural movie about kids in the summer set in more innocent times. Basically any time you'd expect child nudity in real life.). That said, given how much Hollywood has abused things, they really don't deserve the trust.Gotta give the Hollywood producers an out.