Search results for query: *

  1. R

    ISOT WI select Union and Confederate states and forces ISOT from Jan 1863 to Jan 1823?

    They could do that theoretically, if sufficiently committed to achieving peace, even on secessionist terms, as quickly and simply as possible. Perhaps Peace Dems could pursue this policy under the self-delusion that generous dealing with the CSA on territorial questions of this nature would...
  2. R

    ISOT WI select Union and Confederate states and forces ISOT from Jan 1863 to Jan 1823?

    I was thinking the CSA was relatively more advantaged in the 1785 version for this reason, the western theater getting cut off, the Union losing generals like Grant and Sherman, and the ANV vs AOP stalemate remaining with the CSA keeping generals Lee and Jackson. I think it is too late for the...
  3. R

    ISOT WI select Union and Confederate states and forces ISOT from Jan 1863 to Jan 1823?

    1823 - Awesome map, @Buba Agree - loss of lands and the wealth and productivity of those lands is relatively worse for the USA than the CSA, but not by large margin. The USA *still* remains by far the overpowering manufacturing power and food-producing power over the CSA. Certain imports...
  4. R

    ISOT WI select Union and Confederate states and forces ISOT from Jan 1863 to Jan 1823?

    WI select Union and Confederate states and forces ISOT from Jan 1863 to Jan 1823? The limitation is that only those states (and people and forces on the land of those states) that were admitted parts of the Union in 1823 are ISOT back in time, whereas any state that was still in a territorial...
Back
Top