Search results

Please, Navalny is only the 'leader of the opposition' in EU/US media. The guy (the only time that goes to elections) has less than 2% of the votes, even less than the completely discredited communist party.

Possibly - The Russians are very good at camouflage. But, the very public presence of the forces is a message.

For what? Ukraine don't have anything of value for Russia that justify the shitshow and sanctions that move guarantee. Oh, from a military point of view, is indeed easy for Russia to do that, but is a bad option, and Putin with all is defects and problems is not that stupid from a large margin.

Well, in fairness to the Russian position, the tension is growing in the area, so is prudent for them to move more forces in the area, just in case. OFC, can be the other, more nefarious option, but for now, only few know.

Russia wants what allways wanted - a buffer state between Russia territory and NATO forces.

The LNG program still delivers gas at a much higher price than the one via NS2, even if LNG operates at perfect conditions.

How many plants Poland has right now? And how much cost each? How many years do you need to build one?

Poland doesn't have the money to build enough nuclear plants for that. Not by a long shot. If Germany wants / can go that way they go, but the Greens & Cº don't let these nuclear plants be built in Germany, so...

Germany needs cheap gas from Russia. The US can't provide the necessary quantities and its gas is much more costly.

Russia is not interested in Ukrainian territory - is more interested in maintaining the current conflict - at low level - forever, one thing that for one stops Ukraine to enter NATO. The objective for Russia is to not have NATO at his frontiers. Also, the series of sanctions related tu the...