Search results

  1. paulobrito

    WarPac vs. NATO Tank and Armored Vehicle Designs/Doctrine

    Also after the end of the Cold War is discovered that the estimates of the capabilities of WP hardware are meh - sometimes in one direction sometimes in the other. And a lesson taught countless times by war that many forgotten time and time again - the quality of the training of the people of...
  2. paulobrito

    WarPac vs. NATO Tank and Armored Vehicle Designs/Doctrine

    If you truly believe they sell the full capabilities of they systems you are for a very rude awakening.
  3. paulobrito

    WarPac vs. NATO Tank and Armored Vehicle Designs/Doctrine

    The truth is that while Russia and China don't know the true capabilities of US forces, US forces also don't know the full capabilities of they forces. Only in a war, you are confronted with these. Hope to never know then.
  4. paulobrito

    WarPac vs. NATO Tank and Armored Vehicle Designs/Doctrine

    Russia like adversaries have plenty of redundant, multi-layered systems including AWAC type ones. They are also well trained and have a capable doctrine. With these types of systems, the invader is detected at longer distances than by the Iraquis for sure. And after you are detected the...
  5. paulobrito

    WarPac vs. NATO Tank and Armored Vehicle Designs/Doctrine

    High and fast - SAMs and fighters kill you. Low and fast - SAMs / SPAAGS kill you. Against a competent opponent with equivalent / almost equivalent weapons, the capabilities of penetrating enemy air space is way more difficult than the USAF as used to get against Arabs and co.
Top