Search results for query: *

That is a good point. good consequences in order are: 1. humanity not going extinct 2. humanity improving (technology level and/or genepool) 3. forming a stable society 3b. said society must not be some sort of hell on earth 4. individual prosperity / freedom

Personally, I favor consequentialism. A moral system is either good or bad based on the proven consequences it has on a society that practices it. Incidentally, that does mean that certain religious based morality systems do have a proven track record for good results.

objective is an adjective used to describe a thing. You two are applying this adjective to different things. and from there comes your mixup. He is applying it to "how does an individual rule apply". "shooting people is objectively bad according to X" "shooting people is subjectively either bad...