Search results

I was being mildly factitious. I thought you meant removing any RINO voters as well from the party. I wasn't assuming a Night of Long Knives. Just an elimination of any sort of dissent from the Party along with the purity tests that would accompany it.

By all means, get a purge going. I'm sure that will end in nothing but good things.

A week would be an insane rush in a case like this. A day is...beyond a rush, and that would assume either previously discussed scenario based on the strength of the initial ffillings alone as effectively injuctive relief. One that is effective deciding the case in favor of the plantiffs and...

What is far more likely to come into play is the time, how the Supreme court manages their time, and how long state v. State cases typically take. First, the defendants have until 3pm Thursday to respond. With 7 states, the original filer and 6 states filling amiscus briefs in support, and 4...

The problem is that their primary claim isn't centered around injury, specifically alleging a transgression under a statute. It is specifically because they are alleging that Act 77 is unconstitutional under the PA constitution. That is a case that can inherently be brought at anytime because...

I am not talking about the bloody typos. I am talking about issues with her first exhibit. You can't just redact the identity of a witness and say that you will reveal it in court. Setting up the viel for a witness who you have demonstrated has legitimate fear for their safety requires a...

You can deal with that, by having a larger team and partitioning out the work, it's not perfect. But this is the law, it doesn't award participation trophies. If you screw up, there are consequences. And I might appreciate that this was hard. But Lawyers are without pity. Its not just...

She could have the best arguments in the world, but the filling is hot garbage. No lawyer I have found has remotely found it satisfactory. Redacted witnesses, using affidavits from other dismissed lawsuits with out disclosure. Not show direct harm to her plantiffs or directly siting the...

Lets leave aside, that they will first need to call an emergency session of the PA legislature into session, and manage the vote. They haven't done it yet, and that same stay that prevents certification of elections means that in a couple days they won't have a legislature. Beyond that, they...

It would have to be a group of significant size. Because if she isn't representing the candidate and is in fact representing a group of voters, they will have to show that they voted, that their particular votes were somehow compromised, and that the damage is significant enough to warrant the...

Then who are they representing? You cannot sue just cause. And in order to get votes over turned, they would have to show their client was damaged. Cut loose? That is literally how Dobbs portrays it, and neither he nor Rudy are on SB. With that in mind, its hardly an unreasonable conclusion.

The longer explanation came from Guiliani on Lou Dobbs on Monday night. Dobbs characterized them as cutting her loose. Looking for a clip now. Here is the clip As for the funding sources, that doesn't matter. If she isn't representing Trump or the Campaign, then who is she filing suit on...

https://www.donaldjtrump.com/media/trump-campaign-statement-on-legal-team/ Its a pretty short press release. Especially since she was mentioned as part of the team in Trumps twitter just days earlier.

The problem is that he was using the data available on November 3rd according to the statement, which means that he was pulling them from Edison, as the official numbers aren't released. Edison is an unofficial data reporting service which has deals to get official vote totals, but they are...

Who is she filling on behalf of? She has to have standing to bring a valid lawsuit. Also why she hasn't been counter sued, they might be waiting for this. It is far easier to prove defamation and slander based on testimony and statements in a court of law.

Yeah. I read that one in specific. That's the one where the guy used the wrong states data. Ninja.

That isn't happening. The officer core has never liked him, and he's basically squandered most of his good will with the rank and file. Selling out the Kurds, both not bringing the troops home and then doing so abruptly, and dealing with the Taliban aren't things to really make you popular...

Extraordinary Claims require extraordinary proof. I will not say there isn't any fraud, that hasn't ever been true. But proving the vast conspiracy that is being alleged, the sort that both would be needed to shift the election and survive the Georgia hand recount, is going to require a court...

It might cost the Republicans the Senate if they believe it in GA. But longer term, yeah this isn't going to be good. And I don't think I will ever forgive him for that.

Judges are really reluctant to set aside or overturn the results of elections. They are more likely to do that if you can prove fraud than misconduct. If you were just trying to prosecute Dominion, that would probably be an easier lift. But actually getting rid of what I will remind you on...