Search results for query: *

That second one is basically road rage and nothing new for either race

Because it is history. Good or bad, you should always look and learn form them.

Nothing should be moved.

It was, BUT it did offer a spot that could be used as a way of preventing the South from getting supplies. The South was destroying Union Armoreis and bases the whole time leading up to Sumter. All in the south.

People have shown that even people of color are not safe. If they were not fond of Natives or Blacks they are trying to get them taken down. Ghandi, for example. A teddy statue got moved. Anything Andrew Jackson will be targeted. Lincoln is targeted. You don't seem to understand that letting...

He has made it clear that even the L&C wasn't enough to show him taking any statue down is an issue. As long as it is a bad part of history it is fine.

Mexico is proud of thier heritage so I doubt that. They generally like both European heritage and native last I checked. Churchill is recent. Why arnt they going after the older ones who owned slaves? Why a prime minister and not a king?

Canada removed the founder of thier country

Bacle. How come we are the only country that disgusted wkrh out history? Is Italy taking down statues of Roman leaders? France taking down Napoleon? What about Spanish taking down conquistadors? Mexico taking down Aztecs?

They arnt wrong about them being democrats

If you say "that is fine" to one thing and if they use a similar reason for another...does that not make the reason that they are bad the same? Basically the left won't stop u til all American history is rewritten and you are advocating it is fine to get rid if a bad time in our history. MLK...

Bacle, They don't care. If they are white, it is white America. Hell, even if they are black it seems the left will target them in some way

They moved the fucking statue of Teddy from the New York Museum because it had natives looking up at him....

Huh. See what happens when you give them an inch

Huh, I always knew they were wierd. I need to see how they compare to Korea

Fort Sumter was one of many attacks against union armories and things in the south

Right, I'm just using it as an example

I have a friend whose grandfather was a Nazi soldier. He didn't have a choice. He was standard Werhmact. Do you think he should hate his grandfather?

Exactly. The generals may not have been good people, some were better then others, but they were not leaders

Without knowing our ancestors and trying to keep your line going because of the accomplishments of them, we are just going to repeat history over and over.