Search results

Except it won't work that way and they know it. They just hoped we wouldn't notice

From what I heard, all the right leaning judges are like, "I can see how this would be bad for the entire presidency" And then you had Brown and Seyomor going "Well...we have to go off the intentions they had in mind!" Or "it was not for national security reasons therefore!" The fact that they...

I agree dying by fire is horrible

He had a conspiracy theory that revolved around the Simpsons. As well as the fact that apperently he thought Trump was in kahoots with the dems and was patt of the big lie

The jury selection and any kind of unbiased jury of his peers

It's just people doodling and glooming

I mean, there are still plenty of judges who uphold the law over ideals. Like Amy Totenburg in GA who so far has ruled against Dominion voting machines

It will because there are even liberal judges who will go with the truth and the facts over feelings

This is opening a huge easily appealed situation

From what I gather yhe judge can make the decision without the two if they want too.

How is it not legal?

Isn't that perfectly legal?

Never trust former anyone. Simple as

Oh Kemp did amazing with covid from what my family told me.

Why would he have is future son in law murdered?

Abhorsen definitely read up on Georgia law. Unlike others in this thread. @The Immortal Watch Dog you talking about what happend to his future son in law who died on the way to a campaign fir Loeffler?

The texts alone should be more then enough.

The forensics lab is pretty much the only good thing they bring. Make it it's own thing but it is still important. Did they bring up the texts from Terrance?

Just make the forensics lab the main thing the FBI can be for

Yeah I saw it. Holy hell if these get admitted. It is over