Search results

  1. Yinko

    Gun Political Issues Megathread. (Control for or Against?)

    Apparently the city of San Francisco tried the same kind of thing, banning the city from having dealings with any entity from any state that held anti-woke agendas. This ended up being something like 30 states. They had to repeal the bill last year because they couldn't even get toilet paper...
  2. Yinko

    Gun Political Issues Megathread. (Control for or Against?)

    Is that still a valid concern?
  3. Yinko

    Gun Political Issues Megathread. (Control for or Against?)

    Please poke holes in my idea, this was something that occurred to me the other day and I don't know if it's dumb or not. The purpose of gun control is (supposedly) to limit more dangerous guns but still let people have self-protection. The move to ban SBR's and suppressors was both pushed due...
  4. Yinko

    Gun Political Issues Megathread. (Control for or Against?)

    The two guys he was talking about were both active service. If the ATF is going after the military, should there be some kind of expectation that the military will hit back politically? The military has a shit ton more friends in politics than the ATF do.
  5. Yinko

    Gun Political Issues Megathread. (Control for or Against?)

    I think most states have it the other way around. Open carry with no pre-reqs, concealed carry only with a license.
  6. Yinko

    Gun Political Issues Megathread. (Control for or Against?)

    Exactly. Here's my question though, will this result in guns no longer being a partisan issue? I mean, before it was basically split along party lines, but now you have middle-class white women arming up, black dudes, east Asians, and pretty much every other demographic jumping on the band...
Top