1. W

    Is there any particular reason other than speciecism as to why exactly human infants should have a higher legal status than, say, cats or dogs?

    Actually, spaghetti and meatballs is made in the image of God: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flying_Spaghetti_Monster
  2. W

    Is there any particular reason other than speciecism as to why exactly human infants should have a higher legal status than, say, cats or dogs?

    Tell me, if Peter Singer or Michael Tooley were to come to this site and advocate in favor of infanticide, would they get banned from the site for this?
  3. W

    Is there any particular reason other than speciecism as to why exactly human infants should have a higher legal status than, say, cats or dogs?

    Elaborate, please. Also, what about pigs? https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-020-01906-4
  4. W

    Is there any particular reason other than speciecism as to why exactly human infants should have a higher legal status than, say, cats or dogs?

    Even with painless infanticide being legalized, though, there should still be plenty of human infants who will subsequently grow to become adults and thus continue the human race/species.
  5. W

    Is there any particular reason other than speciecism as to why exactly human infants should have a higher legal status than, say, cats or dogs?

    You mean similar to how society used to value more than blacks before the Civil Rights Era, especially in the Southern US?
  6. W

    Is there any particular reason other than speciecism as to why exactly human infants should have a higher legal status than, say, cats or dogs?

    Is there any particular reason other than speciecism as to why exactly human infants should have a higher legal status than, say, cats or dogs? I was inspired to ask this question because a decade ago, a couple of pro-choice philosophers wrote a "thought analysis" essay wondering whether some...
Back
Top