Search results

Would really help the Ukrainians against the Russians lol. If they can be mass produced in the millions.

No, because the Ukrainian nation will survive through its females. Their children will be half-Ukrainian genetically (and the other half will be genetically close Eastern Europeans) while being largely or fully culturally Ukrainian. Well, why exactly do we want the Baltics in NATO? Or Finland...

Russia wants to eliminate Ukrainians as a separate nation and deny their country the opportunity to join the European Union and NATO.

Would you have said the same thing for the Soviet Union during World War II?

The thing is, though, that the decision whether or not to continue the war is up to Russia. Russia can exit Ukraine at any time, thus ending this war. If Russia wants a long war, then that's what it's going to get, but it will be Russia's choice and the West and Ukraine simply reacting to this...

No; after all, if Ukraine's male population will be decimated as a result of this war, then there really will be a shortage of available Ukrainian men for Ukrainian women to marry, and the rest of Eastern Europe doesn't have a surplus of men, so ...

Russia can't strategically win its war against Ukraine; at best, it can only achieve a tactical victory, and even then, possibly only after years of fighting and hundreds of thousands or perhaps even millions of casualties. Ukrainians don't want to live under Russian rule. Not even those in...

If you will believe that this will have a meaningful impact, then this should be most evident in the most Democratic areas, right? I mean with the 2024 vote totals relative to the 2020 vote totals.

FWIW, I myself oppose the filibuster, but trying to get Manchin and Sinema to flip on this appears to be pointless. They're hard as rocks on this issue. The plus side of a continued filibuster is that it would make further immigration restriction by legislation harder for the Republican Party...

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-politics/biden-trump-2024-poll-approval-b2091317.html https://www.newsweek.com/joe-biden-holds-2024-edge-over-donald-trump-despite-midterm-woes-poll-1711631

Let's just hope that the Republicans themselves can actually present a positive vision for the US, you know?

I misspelled the SPLC's name here on purpose, because they get rich off of doing this. And Yes, I know that the SPLC is loony.

Ironic considering that the $PLC has previously criticized Wikipedia for being too balanced: https://www.splcenter.org/hatewatch/2018/03/12/wikipedia-wars-inside-fight-against-far-right-editors-vandals-and-sock-puppets

"Anything" might be stretching it a bit too far, but Yes, I heard that Wikipedia has a problem with Wokes, unfortunately.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/U.S._economic_performance_under_Democratic_and_Republican_presidents

Look at job creation since January 2021.

I'll try to remember from now on to multiquote. Sorry about that. And Yeah, Biden has been screwing up with inflation. That I will admit.

I meant the *economic* recovery in 2021.

What would your ideal Republican Party look like? Something that takes its platform from VDARE.com?

And the Gulf of Tonkin incident in 1964 that dragged us into Vietnam for the next decade.