1. W

    What is less implausible in the period from 1563-1863 - Habsburg or Romanov annexation of Moldavia and Wallachia?

    Thanks; so the people living in Odessa, Mykolaiv, and Kherson are known as Yedisantsy. Interesting.
  2. W

    What is less implausible in the period from 1563-1863 - Habsburg or Romanov annexation of Moldavia and Wallachia?

    But wasn't all of Transylvania a vassal, not just the northern part?
  3. W

    What is less implausible in the period from 1563-1863 - Habsburg or Romanov annexation of Moldavia and Wallachia?

    Southern Transylvania was Orthodox in 1850 (first map above) and 1930 (second map below): Whereas apparently all of Transylvania was already under Hapsburg rule by 1700!
  4. W

    What is less implausible in the period from 1563-1863 - Habsburg or Romanov annexation of Moldavia and Wallachia?

    Southern Transylvania was not under direct Ottoman rule in 1700: The Banat was but apparently not southern Transylvania.
  5. W

    What is less implausible in the period from 1563-1863 - Habsburg or Romanov annexation of Moldavia and Wallachia?

    Why did southern Transylvania never become Uniate-majority like northern Transylvania did?
  6. W

    What is less implausible in the period from 1563-1863 - Habsburg or Romanov annexation of Moldavia and Wallachia?

    Steve, do you know why Austria-Hungary never made the recovery of Oltenia a war aim after Romania's entry into World War I?
  7. W

    What is less implausible in the period from 1563-1863 - Habsburg or Romanov annexation of Moldavia and Wallachia?

    Not necessarily; Russia can still access Constantinople through Dobruja in Europe as well as through Asia Minor (Anatolia) if it will ever conquer it.
  8. W

    What is less implausible in the period from 1563-1863 - Habsburg or Romanov annexation of Moldavia and Wallachia?

    The Hapsburgs briefly controlled Craiova, in western Wallachia, in the early 18th century, so I do think that having the Hapsburgs control Wallachia is probably more realistic than having the Hapsburgs control Moldavia (other than Bukovina).
  9. W

    What is less implausible in the period from 1563-1863 - Habsburg or Romanov annexation of Moldavia and Wallachia?

    Would a Romanov-puppet Romania count for this? Because that's what Catherine II apparently wanted with her Greek Plan: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Greek_Plan I suppose that we could also see a direct Russian annexation of all of Moldavia while the Neo-Byzantine Empire led by a Russian...
Back
Top