Search results for query: *

Those articles are both almost a year or more old.

While amusing, legally it's a horrible suggestion since that layout/name is trademarked.

To be fair the guy rambles for like 10 minutes before actually getting to the issue...

The commerce clause will punch that in the nuts so hard if it passes...

Kyle isn't even technically enrolled in ASU... Though it's a pity, if he was and they did he would get to sue ASU too.

The problem with that case, is that her action's do not qualify as Self Defense under the law...

Yea, that was hilarious given the prosecutor's are literally on video doing everything up to and including providing fake evidence to the defense in their attempt to convict him.

Unfortunately the DA wasn't testifying under oath, so it's not Perjury.

Keep in mind bad actors often use publicly available information, like the name of an NBC producer they got off google, to lend credence to their stories.

Especially when the metadata was brought out and they found the two video's were created 21 minutes apart.

The prosecution was just caught providing false evidence to the defense...

The Judge told the defense twice to save the objections till their closing... So even if the defense wants to it would probably be a bad idea.

If it's true we'll find out tomorrow when that juror is excused. That said... I hope he also sent it to the defense... Because the Judge might not notice or even get the message...

It's doubtful. And even if they somehow convince all 12 juror's, they have what's pretty much the clearest case for an appeal possible.

Yes, which is why he was protesting so hard about the Judge telling him to get an expert.

The DA directly implied to the jury that the defendant utilizing their fifth amendment right to not talk about the case was an admittance of guilt. And then the DA made things much much worse by ignoring the judge's earlier order and then arguing with said judge about...

The DA basically just handed the defense a miss-trial.

This is... Honestly just kind of sad at this point... Also I think their current witness might be either high or mentally challenged in some manner...

Yea, that was when Grosskreutz began trying to claim he didn't point his pistol at Rittenhouse as the defense pulled up the pictures from various angle's showing Grosskreutz pointing his pistol at Rittenhouse.

He didn't do very well. And because if the prosecution didn't call him as a witness the defense would have just used the video's to paint their own picture of events. This way they can drum up sympathy and at least try to portray Kyle as the aggressor.