Search results

No, I am using the legal defination, because that's what the law does give a shit about. As I explained to you, they don't have to be the owner or partial owner for this to apply. They just need to have a vested financial interest, which they do, because Twitter gives them large amounts of...

A financial stakeholder is defined as "groups that stand to benefit if the venture or company succeeds" this very specifically includes "suppliers" which Amazon falls under because it supplies the hosting space for Twitter's servers.

Actually Amazon signed a pretty big deal with Twitter recently. Unfortunately for them, that deal creates enough of a financial stake that trying to claim there wasn't one would be silly.