Search results for query: *

Aaaand that's it for the moment...

Which is probably a good part of the problem, when US foreign policy is "do as I say, not as I do"...

Yeah, exactly as much as you can expect, when US State Sec comes and tells "we will partition your country, it's really for the best (that we can pillage your nation to line our pockets like we did under Yeltsin)". Some food for thought: There's an excellent interview with F. William Engdahl...

I guess its because they need an enemy, and China has grown too big and powerful to be made to submit to US and "liberal values". Also, Russia has a lot of natural resources that could be "liberalized" and "democratized". Hell, Hillary Clinton once said "it was unfair the wealth of Siberia...