Search results for query: *
- Users: TheRejectionist
- With Is there any particular reason other than speciecism as to why exactly human infants should have a higher legal status than, say, cats or dogs? thread
- Content: Threads, Posts
- Order by date
-
Is there any particular reason other than speciecism as to why exactly human infants should have a higher legal status than, say, cats or dogs?
Also because they were the only ones to not care about "crossing" the limit.- Word Count: 14
- TheRejectionist
- Post #50
- Forum: University of the Sietch - Philosophy and Essays
-
Is there any particular reason other than speciecism as to why exactly human infants should have a higher legal status than, say, cats or dogs?
You can't continue the species with , while lovable, cutesy animals. Infants can make a better world and are your own flesh and blood. If you wanna get philosophical, it's your own immortality.- Word Count: 33
- TheRejectionist
- Post #5
- Forum: University of the Sietch - Philosophy and Essays