Search results for query: *

My understanding was that we could speculate, but not blindly. IFF (which translates to IF AND ONLY IF) you have some sort of evidence to back up your speculation. That way we can each take a look at it and judge the merits of your 'case'.

A tunnel could be better, but it would take a LOT longer to complete and have a host of other issues/vulnerabilities.

As is the case for 99% of all accidents.

There may have been other means of communication. Pilot's cell could have been the surest way of talking to the port master.

My bet is that this will come down to the owner not wanting to stop earning money by hauling cargo for the time and money it would take to bring the vessels power systems up to spec.

in what way? Once the tugs move a vessel from berthing, and the vessel begins to operate under its own power, tugs become unnecessary. Once the mayday went out, tugs started to respond from every direction. They just weren't close enough to intervene before the Dali struck the piers of the...

Gotcha.

I'm pretty sure there were.

This has some of the dumbest, uninformed takes I've seen in a while. Just throwing a bunch of shit at the wall and hoping it sticks.

Ship was leaving port after loading cargo.

I wouldn't be surprised to see the owners/operators of the Dali get sued into oblivion as well. Sure, there was a pilot on board, but the ship suffered catastrophic failures (apparently), cause still unknown, that resulted in the impact.