1. The Original Sixth

    Is there any particular reason other than speciecism as to why exactly human infants should have a higher legal status than, say, cats or dogs?

    Actually, in that image, it would be man who was made in the image of the spaghetti monster. Not that Dawkins truly understood what an imager was. Or the small legion of lonely virgin atheists.
  2. The Original Sixth

    Is there any particular reason other than speciecism as to why exactly human infants should have a higher legal status than, say, cats or dogs?

    Because humans are imagers of God. We were made in God's image to carry out his will. Animals are not.
Back
Top