Search results for query: *

I don't doubt that managing property is certainly work, but that's kinda the bare minimum for owning property in general lmao. You shouldn't get brownie points for 'the absolute minimal expected for you owning something'. Owning a damned car requires work too, I just don't expect to get free...

At the end of the day, economies work on labor. Therefore any moneymaking that isn't via some form of labor drains money from people and puts it into the hands of people who aren't working. If one dude rents his house, no biggie. Now what if 50% of homes are being used to rent?...What if 80%...

Fair reasons why they might want to sell it. But why not keep it and rent it out (as immoral as that is)? Why not do any number of things other than 'split a priceless asset into three very much worthless sets of asset'? Boomers are retarded, boomer offspring is usually retarded as a result...

Split between like three+ children, who then sell the house for worthless money, house goes to stupid shit like blackrock and the 3 retard children question "Why are we only able to rent?..." despite selling a house that could be lived in.

They were the first colossal generation who's mindset (for whatever reason) changed from "What should I leave my kids?" to "Why not spend every dollar I own at the casino?"