Search results for query: *

...At this point, I think it's impossible to prove anything to you. This isn't about the facts anymore to you; it's about what you want to believe. Edit: I have video evidence and witness accounts; you have assumptions and appeals to authority. You just straight up don't want to believe that...

You will at least concede that the results of the 2020 election were fraudulent though, won't you? And that it's unlikely that those involved will ever be punished for it?

I'd like to believe that, but let's be honest; most of the Republican establishment does not support Trump. They never really did; they were just pretending so that they could manipulate him, and take advantage of his support in the hopes of subverting his supporters later down the line. As for...

You're not wrong, but the GOP are absolutely terrible at advancing the agendas they've been so consistent in pushing, in comparison to their opponents in the Democrat party; it's not out of the question to assume at this point that, perhaps, at least some of that failure was intentional on their...

It's something I've done on occasion, when I became flustered arguing with someone a bit too strongly (stronger than I could reasonably justify), and didn't actually have any evidence on hand to support my position. It's almost always been something I immediately regretted.

In short, you don't want to believe that the election was fraudulent, because the idea disturbs you; I don't believe I need to point out the issues with that sort of thinking.

I agree; before the pandemic, I used to volunteer at a local church for many years to hand out food to the homeless. There's nothing like the feeling that you're actually helping other people. But it's hard to take good advice when it's presented in such an insulting way.

The reason I don't "say it to your face" isn't because I'm a "cowardly keyboard warrior" (which, I'll grant you, isn't an inaccurate assessment of me; though I will contend being called a "smug idiot" as well); it's because I know you're a liar incapable of arguing in good faith. Conversing with...

The weird thing about that skit though is that it's about Chappelle defending people he liked; people like Airedale260 profess to be in opposition to the Democrats. One would think he'd be chomping at the bit for any excuse to deligitimize their victories; instead, he's defending them. Basically...

You're sure huh? You think this has nothing to do with building a narrative before The Gateway Pundit released their evidence of fraud? What is it going to take to convince you people that the election was fraudulent?

An impressive display of arrogance, for one. Seriously; they must feel really secure in their power to believe that they can get away with outright admitting what they did. They're probably thinking that most people won't care, so long as they present it in the right way; and sadly, I don't...