1. Sixgun McGurk

    What could the various underspending on defence members of NATO afford if they met the 2% GDP spending requirement set by NATO

    No military 'wins' a war. At best it survives intact enough to still be useful enough to dissuade an attacker. This thread is about European defense spending, but the fact is they maintain a modest nuclear deterrence and that's enough. The Russians aren't Communists out to kill everyone with an...
  2. Sixgun McGurk

    What could the various underspending on defence members of NATO afford if they met the 2% GDP spending requirement set by NATO

    You should go visit a VA hospital and talk to the vets. This isn't a movie and the days when some piece of shit globalist politician can send people off to die in useless wars for domestic political reasons and Haliburton is over. I don't hate Koreans, but I don't love them either. Do you know...
  3. Sixgun McGurk

    What could the various underspending on defence members of NATO afford if they met the 2% GDP spending requirement set by NATO

    That is all the US has been 'allowed' to do since we got into the World Police business in 1952. My family has been on the front line of that and as a result is sadly reduced. Gen Z wants to go into 'combat' because you think combat is safe, where you hold all the cards and the giant airstrike...
  4. Sixgun McGurk

    What could the various underspending on defence members of NATO afford if they met the 2% GDP spending requirement set by NATO

    Tell it to South Vietnam. States have no friends, only interests.
  5. Sixgun McGurk

    What could the various underspending on defence members of NATO afford if they met the 2% GDP spending requirement set by NATO

    Crooked political garbage. What do we do when the Zetas decide they want a senator from California in their pocket, run some gangbanger and then just kill the other candidates? They are more dangerous than the North Koreans and Chinese put together.
  6. Sixgun McGurk

    What could the various underspending on defence members of NATO afford if they met the 2% GDP spending requirement set by NATO

    They're not afraid of the Russians. I'm not afraid of them either. I find ten thousand Zeta hitmen and MS-13 right here to be the more compelling enemy and would prefer US troops be deployed on the US border.
  7. Sixgun McGurk

    What could the various underspending on defence members of NATO afford if they met the 2% GDP spending requirement set by NATO

    They don't spend because they aren't really afraid of the Russians. If they aren't afraid there is no reason for us to spend either. Money spent for no reason is money spent on corruption.
  8. Sixgun McGurk

    What could the various underspending on defence members of NATO afford if they met the 2% GDP spending requirement set by NATO

    They could afford an actual army. I would force them to spend by getting out of the alliance and only allying with countries that weren't a burden and had some utility to the USA. Honestly, the Soviets are long dead of old age. I don't care if the Russian Empire grows. They are natural allies...
Back
Top