Search results

🤦‍♀️ One murder in a nation of 300+ million and we ban everyone with that issue from one of the most fundamental rights guaranteed by the Constitution. Following that line of logic would be a recipe to abolish every right and freedom.

Another thing to consider is that if Bill Gates builds this naval fleet, if he wants to use it for anything more than sailing around the world selling PCs, he is going to have to probably match or exceed the value of his carrier in providing for his defense. If he actually uses his small private...

Even accepting the strange premise that the above scenario is only possible because of the 2nd Amendment, this also means that private citizens are going to be heavily armed too and that Bill Gates’ force of 10,000 mercenaries are going to encounter “a rifle behind each blade of grass” which...

The billionaires already have their private armies, you aren’t proposing to reduce those forces in any way, only to remove the ability of individual citizens to defend themselves from them.

Billionaires already have guys with weapons to enforce their agenda on everybody else. They are called the police and military. I just want everybody else to have weapons so that they might have a chance of fighting back if things get too bad.

I am very wary about banning people from owning firearms because of a mental illness. Mental illness can be really subjective and the process of officially labeling someone as mentally ill can likewise be subjective or much less rigorous than a criminal trial with true due process and...