Search results

...I feel like I answered this already... Basically, back in the days when Bethesda was almost universally considered a cool design studio who made good games they released a game called Elder Scrolls IV: Oblivion, this game had it's release and then some DLC that added more playtime. Then it...

Indeed. This is indeed true. But it's also true that you can (at least for the ones that aren't pay-to-win) play and have fun without spending money. Personally I tend to look at them more as "Pay what you want" type games. Certainly, they don't just occasionally ask for dono's to keep going...

ah, but it's not that it's "Horse Armor" it's that it is Horse Armor "DLC". And again, first ever cosmetic microtransaction I'm aware of, first time players were asked to pay for something that wasn't "here's more stuff to do". Also what it has to do is that F2P games can generally "get away...

pretty sure TF2 went F2P before it started doing hats... and that no one is going to get annoyed at you for complaining about CoD monetization right now. ah, Red Dot Sight.

eh, I kind of like what I have right now. I have the first ever cosmetic mtx, I have the most intrusive of major monetizations, I have a game based around getting people to pay as the primary objective, and I have the straw that finally broke the camel's back.

Wondering what people think of my art project.