Search results for query: *

That's... honestly a maybe. Self Defense and Defense of Others can get weird with state to state differences so eh.

Here's the thing. That's not how Self Defence works. Someone said "Active Shooter", there were gunshots, that's it, that's the entirety of what Grosskreutz needs to establish that IN THE MOMENT he had a self-defence argument. And once that's done the Prosecution has to disprove self-defence...

Yes Grosskreutz had a self-defence claim because some rando was yelling about an active shooter and therefore Grosskreutz had a reasonable argument that he was expecting an active shooter. This, amusingly enough, also applies to Skateboard Guy and Jumpkick Man. None of this obviates...

amusingly, there are a number of articles that do exactly this.

Ehhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh. Ok, the title holder was Dominic Black, the gun was purchased with money given to Black by Kyle on the understanding that when Kyle was 18 Dominic would give Rittenhouse the gun. So like... yes and no. It's worth noting, it was legally important...

Oh absolutely, the answerers are pretty much all competent, but the question is just so dumb lol.

Behold, Abject Stupidity https://www.quora.com/Gaige-Grosskreutz-did-not-attack-Kyle-Rittenhouse-Gaige-raised-his-hands-and-Kyle-responded-by-aiming-his-rifle-at-him-If-Gaige-did-not-intend-to-harm-Kyle-how-can-his-shooting-be-justified

The overwhelming majority of people also think Three Mile Island was a catastrophic disastre that justified never building another nuclear reactor again. I wonder what I'd find if I went and looked at press coverage vs actual court documents...

...wow, first few paragraphs and he's already averaging a bit more than a lie a paragraph. Impressive! EDIT: an AR-15 is not a machine gun, Kyle did not shoot as his first resort, did not shoot anyone in cold blood, and no, taking the bullets out and putting the gun down is not a viable...

The sheer amount of outright lying going on would be hilarious if it wasn't so sad.

Do note that they cite an EXISTING state law for that, so there's at least an example of how you can do it.

...Police, much like Democracy, are the worst form of Law Enforcement, except for all the others that we've tried. Get an actually fleshed out proposal and then find people to rip your proposal apart until they can't find bigger holes in it than what's already present and then maybe. By then...

...That seems incredibly weird to do but ok I guess...

If the Defense was doing their jobs Binger would have been interrupted every few minutes in Closing. Where he wasn't outright lying he was saying stuff not in evidence. Never even mind his decision to make this a 2A case lol.

I'm pretty sure they DID use ground footage... And everything important was apparently behind lightposts or something...

...He shouldn't have been in his home town protecting property which might as well have been uninsured? Look, Tulsa was shit, that doesn't mean people should roll over and let "activists" return the favor to people who don't even live in the same area let alone did that let alone share the same...

It's not nearly big enough to, in and of itself, waive the right to self defense, or to change the legal calculus regarding self-defense for that matter.