Search results

Well hopefully it won't damage the reactor part.

Are you assuming the Russians are just selling old stock, and not building more? If they manufacture brand new ones and sell them to Iran for more than it costs to build them, they come out ahead.

In the Iraq war, the Western Allies had complete air superiority, and were able to quickly destroy Saddam's remaining conventional forces from on high. The Challenger II was "invincible" against Arab insurgents with vintage Soviet-era export-model munitions, and improvised weapons.

Soviet Russia, dude. Hitler was merely Saruman. Stalin was Sauron.

Maybe they don't want to show off what their hardware can do at the moment.

"Sexualization of women" This from media people who will not speak against the sexualization of small children... Well you still need something to motivate your KGB guys with then. The implied promise that if you survive the "meatgrinder" you might get to take a cute young lady home with you...

Pardon my asking a basic question, but shouldn't a tank shell only fire when something specific is done to the non-pointy end? What I'm picking up here is that just being near an explosion will make all the shells go up together.

Meanwhile - Medvedev on Russia's endless supply of More Dakka. Take it away Dmitry: “Enemies of Russia are still carefully “calculating” our losses and our reserves. They hope in vain to diminish our capabilities. It continues. Enough for everyone, not only for Ukraine! We have thousands of...

They don't need to do that. They can just conscript people.

I think it's generally understood that Biden is Xi's puppet, not Putin's. Unless the Tsar has been getting some info passed along from the Grand Poohbear.