Search results for query: *

Well it would be if they could pull the boxes off from above with a helicopter...

Journalists get things wrong. Someone I know who used to be involved in mountain rescue here in South Africa once told me that no matter how clearly the who what when of the accident and rescue was explained to them, the report in the newspapers would seem to always get major details just plain...

Indeed. And for a list of reasons.

Well - maybe the people in those govt agencies know that the media cannot be trusted to report anything either competently or honestly.

For receiving radio signals, I think it's antenna size that's the big deal. Transmission on the other hand? Power becomes much more important.

And now he'll have to not be earning money from that ship for a good deal more time and money...

More People On The Internet Saying Things... https://voxday.net/2024/03/30/ban-the-panopticon/ Well, ship was having a power outage... but surely the black box would have it's own backup supply?

One reason I'm not accepting the "this was just a freak accident where a whole number of things went wrong" explanation is that if it were true, then for every case where all of those things went wrong, there ought to be multiple cases in which only some of them did. How many times does it...

Meanwhile, people on the Internet are saying things...

So what I'm picking up here is that the cargo ship that rammed itself into a bridge was malfunctioning? Not just an "idiot at the wheel who wasn't paying attention" scenario?