Search results

I mean, in fairness to Hollywood, there is a difference between child nudity and child porn. There's actually a lot of movie situations in which I can see child nudity being considered part of the legitimate move making art (IE, a family scene where parents are giving kids a bath. A newborn...

What the actual hell? Looking this up, it appears to have been a matter of State law, not Federal, and the State in question appears to have been, to nobody's surprise, California. So yes, it appears in California child porn in not child porn if the kid in question is a "performer"...