Search results for query: *

what makes it public? do you know what public means? And if it is a 'public square' then every previous argument about being a provider is bullshit.

But twitter is not the digital equivalent of infrastructure. It is the digital equivalent of a convention hall. It is a forum of discussions. It's a conversation club.

How do you rationalize extending common carrier status from an ISP, which owns and operates infrastructure, to a website, which is simply a collection of code? Furthermore, it seems awfully anti freedom to try to put a gun to twitter's head and make them do what you what. If you don't like it...

That's really not how it works. There has never been a time that private businesses were not allowed to censor the content they deliver. You're essentially arguing that tv stations can't play abridged versions of films or censor for language, and they do that all the time. Like I don't know...

If I run a website, I am allowed to have whatever rules I want. If one of those rules is that false information gets flagged, so be it.