Search results

another loss for insurrectionists in court

Ban me now if you think that, stop this lawyer nonsense it was beneath you, you have your legal fiction now do your job as the mob orders edit: save us a day, it's simply not possible given his admited life history that he is too stupid not know where his talking points come from

thats the point of dog whistles they are used so morons don't even know they are carrying water for the person who started them,which surprise was a antisemitism in this case

yes you do check all the boxes the argument was nu uh I provided evidense you said un still waiting on a argument your civil liberties? you moved to the US? congratulations

okay this could actually be productive, everything he said boils down to memes that find their root in the idea that jews are secretly the globe finical masters and are the root of all the wrong in the world.. I mean yeah its pretty paint by numbers but it's all there

Now THAT , that is clever

you would be the expert still waiting for you to have a argument instead of just refuting reality like that means anything

the immoral lap dog it is then

waiting for a argument

eh it's likely because he's been in the right thank you Dr Eastman

Care to try to form an argument, or are you just here to vent hate and failure? A strictly ad hominem attack polymorized with a direct appeal to the mob, is that the populous trifecta of failure's theme music?

might not be necessary, not like people will want the guy who lost a billion dollars defending them but unless there was something to the fever dream that it was purposeful you don't loose the bar for just one screw up that isn't a felony

well that is just the most compeling argumentation ever I guess I must be a hack good job, I'm sure you will receive many likes

well you can certainly make the argument, but I don't find it at all compelling similar language has more to do with everyone involve being lawyers talking in court over agreed on terms and precedent then a I direct 1 to 1 approximation, it did happen and unfortunately for everyone in this...

Oh I see the problem here let me help FYI convinicng your marks that grieving parents are crisis actors in effect further destroying their lives in ways hither to unknown to man IS actually wrong, glad to help you out there

well as I understand it's, Madow was commenting on facts that the court verified, OAN does employ someone who does also work for the Russian government.she can have opinions and comment about that, Tucker has been ruled to says things on air no reasonable person can be expect to take as true...

Could you explain that so someone can parse it without doing 6 weeks of background research? just the basic context of what you are saying

OAN? yeah they are trash but they have only ever been a bought and paid for pr organ of click of rich people I mean they don't' try very hard to hide it not surprising their slap law suit got laughed out of court

well you would be the be subject mater expert on preposterous positions to hold OtOH that is the defense most folks caught spreading disinfo for profit default to, well it's the one that has worked for Fox and Jones in the past, then again that seems to be changing finally

right sorry I said anything not like it matters