Search results

... I'm going to drop this, because its tangential at this point and I don't have deep enough medical knowledge to argue the point, even if I disagree. Not what I was talking about, but again, tangential. You are incapable of reading comprehension is the conclusion I have come to, because...

No, I'm not. I'm not demanding anything, and you're just issuing baseless (and false) accusations, and you just broke Godwin's Law. I haven't made any assumptions. I've used rational deductions and Epistemology 101 level accepted facts. And as I said the way I interpreted his statement was a...

What? This is a horrible misinterpretation of what I'm trying to do, and a reading comprehension failure. I'm not trying to convince him God exists, I'm seeking clarification on what he believes and on his thought processes. The post he made was basically what I was looking for. Okay, first...

Then you need to rephrase your statement, because RAW, "I seem fundamentally incapable of believing in something I cannot prove exists," means you cannot believe in minds other than your own. I'm not trying to pull a 'gotcha' here - I just want you to revise that statement to something more...

Are you a solipsist? If you genuinely believe that, then the most certain fact is that you know little of either.