Search results

Two reasons: It actually did in many respects, as the peasant villages met most qualifiers for communism internally since that's actually really effective for their socioeconomic context and the nobles gave no fucks about the details of how their food and cloths were made, and the ideology of...

What I'm getting at is that what you put forward is critically misunderstanding of what individualism, even outright atomization, actually mean and do. By placing the sole person as the absolute unit of society, status becomes incredibly fluid because you don't have an order that can declare...

You don't get to move goalposts when using somebody else's argument. Adam Katz specifically mentions "titles, formal associations, and histories" as things rejected by individualism, but they aren't. The entire bloody reason it got significant at all was because it's obsessive with titles...

This is the core flaw of your comprehension of "individualism, TNoL. At a basic level, it appears slightly applicable to LordsFire's religious version of individualism, which says these properties are of ultimately minor significance (not no significance as you keep strawmanning) because of the...