Search results

Except that you claim First Cause as one of three aspects of material reality that "prove" the supernatural, one of three things that do exist, of which all three don't actually have any such proof because the first and third are rejected by science, with the third landing in court and failing...

Except that physics actually mostly rejects First Cause, because you always land in infinite regress. Even if the First Cause is a logical need, there's no need for the First Cause to be supernatural, save by the most dry definition of lying outside nature because it exists before it. Zero need...