Search results

I'm sorry, do you have some kind of learning impediment?

https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.cnn.com/cnn/2023/05/09/business/mark-zuckerberg-jiu-jitsu-winner/index.html

Isn't that free, or free again?

Well, I didn't mean just that. I was actually just as much referring to cherico replying to a post where I explicitly and specifically said I wasn't claiming something, and interpreted as me in fact claiming exactly that. I would argue though that laziness in writing is at least suggestive of...

Well, by all appearances the American education system also doesn't do a great job at english skills. Reading, writing, comprehension etc.

People like you are the reason the rest of the world has the opinion they do of the American education system.

And you're still an idiot. Once again, I did not say it wasn't an issue. I said the information then provided didn't show anything on the issue, and that you pointing out specific events wasn't useful evidence of trends or statistics. Fortunately, someone with at least a highschool level reading...

Cherico, you don't know how to read. I'll highlight the significant part: "could have simply just left it off as insignificant if the number are low. Not to imply they are..." (Bolding added for emphasis.) That said, more specific anecdotal evidence still isn't statistically meaningful. The...

"Asian" isn't included at all. My bet would be they're stupidly rolled in with either white or hispanic, but they could have simply just left it off as insignificant if the number are low. Not to imply they are, but also I don't think "I've seen it happen." is good evidence of statistical...

On investigation, no he did not. Twitter released some of the code. What they released was specifically the stuff that controls how stuff gets shared more or less. This feels less like brilliant code analysis and more like a simple retweet. That doesn't change that if this is all actually in...

Provenance of the information?

Are you simply incapable of holding a conversation without insults? As to the actual substance, there is no question of who their clients were. They were retained by Twitter, Twitter were the ones who failed to pay, and it's Twitter they're suing. It's Twitter on all the paperwork. Now maybe you...

Well, perhaps I have misunderstood. In your earlier post, I took you saying: in the context of the post you were replying to, was an argument that the lawyers did "deserve" to be screwed over, whilst I took the general phrasing and tone of your last post: as suggesting you didn't approve of...

So, to be clear, you think it's okay to go after a lawyer for poor choice in accepting clients, even funny, but only when it lines up with who you personally think is a bad choice? Surely it's either wrong in both cases, or perfectly legitimate and reasonable in both cases?

It's nothing like that. In your "similar" example there's a contractual relationship, and a financial one. Both important elements that aren't the case here. Then there's a specific obligation under those relationships that is failed, rather than a general implied "obligation" for fairness from...