Search results

Apparently it is disposable. https://www.janes.com/defence-news/news-detail/taiwan-army-orders-additional-kestrel-anti-tank-weapon-systems According to Janes Weapons: Infantry, the Kestrel individual weapon – developed by NCSIST – is a manportable, shoulder-fired, disposable rocket launcher...

More like a forward base for Taiwanese missiles, because Taiwan has no troops or ships to do such operations successfully.

Very difficult, and probably not done on account of not being worth it, at least in case of major escalation.

The problem is that China has no interest in such a compromise, and if it did, no one would trust it to keep to that deal. It would be a diplomatic and morale salami slice off Taiwan for no benefit. If the deal could come with actual concessions and be guaranteed by other powers, it would be a...

It's still a solid "no bells and whistles" aka stealth\high speed or such plane. Most of Russian and Chinese air fleet also consists of such no bells and whistles aircraft that often are less solid at that. The 2 most numerous tac jet models in PLAAF are J-7 (a spiffied up Mig-21) and J-10...

Lemme guess, UK is putting their tugs and coastguard on alert.

https://www.nbcnews.com/news/world/taiwan-china-drone-shot-down-first-time-xi-jinping-rcna45813 Where was the whole "not provoking China" policy when this happened? Let's say there is an annoying guy called Joe Smith. I would love to punch him in the face. However, we all know that would not...

I've re-cited the article you have provided, saying something openly contrary to what you then claimed the article said, as i re-cited it. I rest my case - the case that you can't fucking read with any reasonable level of comprehension of what you're reading. You said DPP is doing it to not...

If you repeat the statement i've just called bullshit with proof that won't make it true. They are doing it to not give a talking point to the opposition, not to "not provoke China", are you trolling or what? Again, who the fuck are you to tell DPP how exactly hostile should they be to China...

Oh DPP does plenty of other things that provoke China. It is directly stated that KMT could see it as provoking China and DPP doesn't want to give them talking points needlessly. Your usual, childishly malicious word twisting has been noted as usual. Goalposts? What goalposts? This is not a...

It's called electioneering, you should have heard of it at your age. Which is why there is such political maneuvering. Have you ever read this link? Statements about "seeking to decouple" are meaningless, when despite sanctions in some quite expensive things the trade value rises.

The prediction that you can't read? That was not a prediction, that was a statement of fact, one that seems as relevant today as it was before. What does KMT position have to do with statements by DPP chairman? You do realize these are different parties with different people and different...

What, you had a fancy to get called a petty fuck for doing a petty thing? Con-fucking-gratulations then, you totally manipulated me there. It's not an insult if it's a statement of fact :D Stop acting retarded and i'll stop calling you a retard. What are you, 7? You're the one who is playing...

Yes, that is the case. Which is why i called out his earlier post saying this: Yes, he said it, "USAF will no longer even attempt to contest air superiority", and now he's trying to stealthily backtrack from it and pretend he actually understands the difference between air denial and "not...

I'm bringing it up? You're the petty fuck who brought up a typo here. Boo fucking hoo, i've started by an argument, but you're the one who splits off our discussion into insults. I think the implication of anything involving niceties in that relationship is quite bold. Have you considered...

Boo fucking hoo, poor quality anon got a poor quality insult, go fuck yourself, or some horse cocks you seem so interested in. So you think you're not retarded as long as you don't declare that you're retarded? How optimistic of you. In your delusional mind, sure. So air superiority over...

>typo "hahaha so self owned" Do you even have any self-respect? >backed off independence >backed off declaring independence Again, not the same meaning. Your own damn fault for using "random" minor changes in terms that change their meaning and make you look like a CCP shill. Expand your...

Oh, so you're too retarded to understand, got it. I was as usual mocking your extremely suspicious ability to take a statement and through being incredibly bad at reading extract a message contrary to what the author meant from that statement. Stop playing the fucking quote games to hide your...

If you can't see it, i recommend an eye doctor. You used a very specific term of "U.S. Air Force will no longer even attempt to contest air superiority" in your post you manipulative asshole. Which means a different thing than "USAF wouldn't even attempt air superiority anymore". Get back to me...

Guess a certain very special individual is getting bold with his precise language retardation, so a couple points: Paraphrasing the DPP Chairman, History Learner doesn't need to declare his illiteracy. The facts speak for themselves. His focus is on spreading defeatism and bullshit in favor of...