Search results

Okay, I'm not going to win this debate and as the good Captain-General said: this is not the spot to have this disagreement, no matter how much I am enjoying it. So getting back on topic, should or should not a pregnant female have the right to terminate any life growing within her womb? I say yes.

These things you say that matter, they are not factual, they are a subjective construct that humanity has created to make it self feel better. The world is barbarity, we just make it seem less so by playing the great game of pretend that we call civilization. In the end context is a subjective...

A life ending is a life ending. If one kills anything, they need to accept that. Death is death and it is permanent, no take-backs. All that reasoning and rationalization does is emotional support, it does not change facts, the first murder marks you as an individual capable and willing to slay...

It's fine, though to create a social construct such as lawful/unlawful is both foolish and common. Killing is killing, no point using words to pretty it up.

When have I ever not referred to it as murder in some form or another?

Eh, if there is nothing that functions as neural tissue, or an analog of such, how can there be a person? If a brain matter equivalent is totally absent then surely it is fine to slay a being, a creature, yes? When a seat of thought, of mind, begins forming, that, that is when the killing...

The murder of the parasite in the mother's womb is fine, so long as two (2) conditions are met: A) All gene donors agree or abstain to the death of it. B) The parasite must not have yet achieved person-hood. Please note, I use the term parasite because that is what the pre-child mass of self...