Search results for query: *

This is just begging for him to counter-sue for people trying, you know, to kill him. Good grief...

The reason that Rittenhouse may have a valid case isn't because they told lies that were 'opinions,' it's because they made a sustained campaign where they said a wide variety of defamatory things about him. If they missed 'alleged' just once in regards to his charges, that opens up a window of...

No, it isn't. Your comparison here is leaving out critical information (that the guy with the rifle is being actively attacked), and is thus fallacious. By your argument, I can drive up to the parking lot of a gun range, and then tell someone else who just drove up that someone/anyone in there...

Except that Grosskreutz did not have reasonable cause to think Rittenhouse was a mass shooter. You do not get to kill someone summarily because 'someone else said he did a thing.' You have to have more than that to establish probable cause or reasonable suspicion, and as Grosskreutz was not a...

This is utter nonsense, and the fact that you think this is credible reflects very poorly on your ability to reason critically. Grosskreutz approached Kyle, while Kyle was on the ground after being physically struck. Kyle pointed his gun at Grosskreutz, a reasonable response given he had just...

...Did you watch the footage of that engagement?

Gaslighting was the whole point. The media literally wanted people to focus on anything but the facts, and harping on about 'crossing state lines' made it sound like he came from a long ways away, instead of a ~10-20 minute drive. It was an attempt to destroy the idea he had a legitimate reason...

What does 'Wisconsin accent' mean to you?

The Judge is certainly still aware that the best possible outcome for Kyle is that the Jury rules him innocent, and after the clownshow of a trial, there's no sane reason for them not to. If they end up hung due to Jury intimidation (guilty is almost but not quite impossible at this point)...

It still would be best for Kyle if we instead get a Jury verdict of innocent. That's harder for the leftist media to attack, though the diehards will still screech he's guilty. I'd rather the Judge issue a warrant for the prosecutors arrests.

That's it then. The Prosecutors now just not morally but also clearly legally should be put up on charges themselves.

If that was completely true, we would live in total anarchy. It is certainly decaying, but it works to some degree, as demonstrated by the fact that society still functions, if not as well as it should.

The thought that has occurred to me, is that if a publisher is successfully sued for a lack of diligence in reporting; IE they keep reporting a lie after they've been reasonably informed it isn't true, they be legally required to spend an equal amount of time and print space repeating the...

Are you really the only one who can't tell the difference between a joke, and an actual argument?

It's the internet. The only way to stop people from making silly memes is by literally turning the internet off.

Are you actively avoiding understanding the point that perception is not dependent on jurisdiction?

The fact that you think this is about 2A, not the right to defend yourself when attacked, tells me how out of tune you are about this case. Yes, 2A and self-defense are certainly linked, but what good does owning a gun do legally, if you know that in using it to shoot people trying to kill you...

The difference here is the massive amount of publicity and political pressure involved. This trial is a cultural turning point for this nation, much as the OJ Trial, the Clinton impeachment, Chauvin trial, etc. This will be seen as indicative of the greater trend of the legal system in our nation.

Kyle Rittenhouse lived the golden rule; acted towards the lives and properties of others as he would have them act towards him and his. Could he have been wiser about the details of how? Probably. But the will to act is more important, and a good plan now is better than a perfect plan never...