Search results

He said 'a bit less,' not 'are irrelevant.' Tone on the internet and all, reading his exact intent is unclear, but you're still replying to something he didn't actually say.

Do you think that a war can be fought with zero collateral casualties?

Can you not think of any negative consequences of this?

He outright ordered the tooling destroyed. One person I know who worked in the aerospace industry said that he ordered the plans destroyed as well, but Lockheed-Martin refused. I'm not so clear on whether or not that actually happened.

Obama ordered production stopped. One of the most blatantly anti-American acts of his administration.

And for those of us who don't recognize that person on sight?

No, but here in America Libertarians often like to pretend they're the only ones who believe in government non-interference, and it's bloody annoying.

The term is 'American Conservative,' not 'Centrist Libertarian.'

The SU-57 is probably better than Gen 4.5 jets. Probably not as good as the F-22 and F-35. Given how few of them there are, they're basically just prestige pieces.

Popularizing the 'It's all the CIA's fault!' excuse.

Ah yes, Communism has only ever failed due to CIA interference, comrade! Certainly this excuse is not old, worn out, beaten to death, and a recurring fantasy of tankies around the world! ...Seriously, it's one thing to not want to be involved in Ukraine, it's another thing to fall so hard for...

You have your own person idea of True Libertarianism. Others are not required to subscribe to your school of thought. You are not some major figure recognized on a cultural figure as publishing or broadcasting particularly insightful or definitive thoughts on the matter. For all her pros and...

Yes, it's disgusting what happens when socialists and Keynesians get more and more control over your government and economy over the decades. Going back to a much more free market system, and stopping the torrent of illegal immigrants into the country, would rapidly move housing prices back...

Fairly well put. A serial murderer still deserves the death penalty. Give them some months on death row so they have a chance to repent before they meet their maker, but out of love of their victims and potential future victims, you still stop and then execute them.

There were two egregious parts to it. 1. That the cigarette tax was so high a man could make meaningful income selling singular cigarettes without paying the tax. 2. That force, which unintentionally turned deadly, was used to enforce such a pathetically petty law.

Some kind of Tron reference. I'm not entirely sure what.

I've heard this argument before, but I've literally never heard of this actually happening. Given the rules of probability around large numbers, and that hundreds of millions of people move around in cars every day, I wouldn't be surprised if it had happened at least once... But can you...

I'd love to see an actual example of this happening. And then attempts to explain how giving porn to children is totally the same as being a fascist.

'Celebrities who got their position partially based on how good-looking they are, and also talk about politics' are a very different thing from 'politicians and political thinkers/activists/critics.' Any actor who talks about politics is almost guaranteed to be good looking. The same is not...

You are literally living in an alternate reality. There's no point in arguing with you about this.