Search results for query: *

Let's not start this debate on another thread. There's already two or three of them over in the Philosophy forum if you want to hash it out again.

Most evangelicals are too busy with IRL for internet discussion, and a lot of them are theology nerds, so that really isn't a helpful distinction. I don't think you have a good idea of how complex Evangelicals believe God is.

How do you define 'normie evangelical'?

The hilarious thing here isn't even that you're making an argument that's old, refuted, and pointless, it's that you don't see how internally contradictory it is. We're talking about the meaning of religious texts. Not 'are the texts true,' but 'what does this text mean?' The argument doesn't...

Another attempt by atheists and the like to functionally rewrite parts of the Bible. You're touching on three things: 1: Sometimes God would have a chat with the angels. 2: The Trinity. 3: God addressing people used to, surrounded by, and sometimes corrupted by, polytheistic societies. These...

As S'task has said, the Bible is the single most well-supported historical document ever. Even if you don't believe in the supernatural parts of it, it has consistently and repeatedly been proven accurate about the existence of historical figures, cities, wars, etc. We have record-keeping of...

This sounds like one of the (many) edgey atheist attempts to redefine history.

...Satanists have been trying to force Christians out of the public square for decades.